Advances in biotreatment of acid mine drainage and biorecovery of metals: 1. Metal precipitation for recovery and recycle

被引:134
作者
Tabak, HH [1 ]
Scharp, R
Burckle, J
Kawahara, FK
Govind, R
机构
[1] US EPA, ORD, NRMRL, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Chem Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
acid mine drainage biotreatment; sulfate reducing bacteria; biological sulfate conversion; biorecovery and recycle of metals; sequential selective metal precipitation and purification process;
D O I
10.1023/A:1027332902740
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Acid mine drainage (AMD), an acidic metal-bearing wastewater, poses a severe pollution problem attributed to post mining activities. The metals usually encountered in AMD and considered of concern for risk assessment are arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese, zinc, copper and sulfate. The pollution generated by abandoned mining activities in the area of Butte, Montana has resulted in the designation of the Silver Bow Creek-Butte Area as the largest Superfund (National Priorities List) site in the U. S. This paper reports the results of bench-scale studies conducted to develop a resource recovery based remediation process for the clean up of the Berkeley Pit. The process utilizes selective, sequential precipitation (SSP) of metals as hydroxides and sulfides, such as copper, zinc, aluminum, iron and manganese, from the Berkeley Pit AMD for their removal from the water in a form suitable for additional processing into marketable precipitates and pigments. The metal biorecovery and recycle process is based on complete separation of the biological sulfate reduction step and the metal precipitation step. Hydrogen sulfide produced in the SRB bioreactor systems is used in the precipitation step to form insoluble metal sulfides. The average metal recoveries using the SSP process were as follows: aluminum (as hydroxide) 99.8%, cadmium (as sulfide) 99.7%, cobalt (as sulfide) 99.1% copper (as sulfide) 99.8%, ferrous iron (sulfide) 97.1%, manganese (as sulfide) 87.4%, nickel (as sulfide) 47.8%, and zinc (as sulfide) 100%. The average precipitate purity for metals, copper sulfide, ferric hydroxide, zinc sulfide, aluminum hydroxide and manganese sulfide were: 92.4, 81.5, 97.8, 95.6, 92.1 and 75.0%, respectively. The final produced water contained only calcium and magnesium and both sulfate and sulfide concentrations were below usable water limits. Water quality of this agriculturally usable water met the EPA's gold standard criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 436
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Spatial regulation of trichome formation in Arabidopsis thaliana [J].
Hulskamp, M ;
Schnittger, A .
SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (02) :213-220
[22]   Prevention of acid mine drainage by sulfate reducing bacteria: Organic substrate addition to mine waste piles [J].
Kim, SD ;
Kilbane, JJ ;
Cha, DK .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 16 (02) :139-145
[23]  
Lens P. N. L., 2000, ENV TECHNOLOGIES TRE, P153
[24]   COMPARATIVE BIOENERGETICS OF SULFATE REDUCTION IN DESULFOVIBRIO AND DESULFOTOMACULUM SPP [J].
LIU, CL ;
PECK, HD .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1981, 145 (02) :966-973
[25]  
MAREE JP, 1987, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V59, P1069
[26]  
MAREE JP, 1983, WATER RES, V21, P141
[27]   Toxicity of heavy metals (Ni,Zn) to Desulfovibrio desulfuricans [J].
Poulson, SR ;
Colberg, PJS ;
Drever, JI .
GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL, 1997, 14 (01) :41-49
[28]   Treatment of acid mine drainage: I. Equilibrium biosorption of zinc and copper on non-viable activated sludge [J].
Utgikar, V ;
Chen, BY ;
Tabak, HH ;
Bishop, DF ;
Govind, R .
INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2000, 46 (01) :19-28
[29]   Quantification of toxic and inhibitory impact of copper and zinc on mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria [J].
Utgikar, VP ;
Tabak, HH ;
Haines, JR ;
Govind, R .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2003, 82 (03) :306-312
[30]   Inhibition of sulfate-reducing bacteria by metal sulfide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage [J].
Utgikar, VP ;
Harmon, SM ;
Chaudhary, N ;
Tabak, HH ;
Govind, R ;
Haines, JR .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 17 (01) :40-48