The reduced local lymph node assay: the impact of group size

被引:12
作者
Ryan, Cindy A. [1 ]
Chaney, Joel G. [1 ]
Kern, Petra S. [2 ]
Patlewicz, Grace Y. [3 ]
Basketter, David A. [4 ]
Betts, Catherine J. [5 ]
Dearman, Rebecca J. [5 ]
Kimber, Ian [5 ]
Gerberick, G. Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH 45253 USA
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Brussels, Belgium
[3] European Chem Bur, JRC, Ispra, Italy
[4] Unilever, SEAC, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
[5] Syngenta Cent Toxicol Lab, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
关键词
local lymph node assay; hazard identification; skin sensitization potential screening;
D O I
10.1002/jat.1303
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 [卫生毒理学];
摘要
The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a skin sensitization test that provides animal welfare benefits. To reduce animal usage further, a modified version (rLLNA) was proposed. Conducting the rLLNA as a screening test with a single high dose group and vehicle control differentiated accurately between skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers. This study examined whether a reduction in animal number/group is feasible. Historical data were utilized to examine the impact of conducting the rLLNA with two mice/group. To assess the effect on the stimulation index (SI) 41 datasets with individual animal data derived using five mice/group were analysed. SIs were calculated on all possible combinations of two control and two high dose group disintegrations per minute (dpm) values. For 25 of 33 sensitizer datasets, > 96% of possible dpm combinations resulted in a calculated SI > 3. The lowest percentages of positive SIs were observed with weak allergens when, in the standard LLNA, the mean SIs would have been nearer to the threshold value of 3. The results indicate that moderate, strong and extreme allergens are more likely than weak allergens to be identified as sensitizers when group sizes of two mice are used within the rLLNA. It is concluded that a rLLNA with two mice/group would display decreased sensitivity and is inappropriate for use in hazard identification. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 523
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
[Anonymous], ALT LAB ANIMALS
[2]
Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 36 (04) :327-333
[3]
The local lymph node assay in practice: a current regulatory perspective [J].
Cockshott, A ;
Evans, P ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Betts, CJ ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Basketter, DA .
HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 25 (07) :387-394
[4]
ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay - II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel [J].
Dean, JH ;
Twerdok, LE ;
Tice, RR ;
Sailstad, DM ;
Hattan, DG ;
Stokes, WS .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 34 (03) :258-273
[5]
Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals [J].
Gerberick, G. Frank ;
Ryan, Cindy A. ;
Dearman, Rebecca J. ;
Kimber, Ian .
METHODS, 2007, 41 (01) :54-60
[6]
Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods [J].
Gerberick, GF ;
Ryan, CA ;
Kern, PS ;
Schlatter, H ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Patlewicz, GY ;
Basketter, DA .
DERMATITIS, 2005, 16 (04) :157-202
[7]
The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization: a cut-down screen to reduce animal requirements? [J].
Kimber, I ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Betts, CJ ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Ryan, CA ;
Kern, PS ;
Patlewicz, GY ;
Basketter, DA .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2006, 54 (04) :181-185
[8]
*ORG EC COOP DEV, 2002, TEST GUID, V429
[9]
*US EPA, 8702600 OPPTS US EPA