Long-term rehabilitation for chronic stroke arm movements: a randomized controlled trial

被引:18
作者
Cauraugh, James H. [1 ,2 ]
Naik, Sagar K. [1 ,2 ]
Lodha, Neha [1 ,2 ]
Coombes, Stephen A. [1 ,2 ]
Summers, Jeffery J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Ctr Exercise Sci, Motor Behav Lab, Appl Physiol & Kinesiol Dept, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Chronic stroke; motor recovery; upper extremity rehabilitation; bilateral movements and active stimulation; ACTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION; STATISTICS NOTES; MOTOR RECOVERY; UPPER-EXTREMITY; TREATMENT ALLOCATION; BILATERAL MOVEMENTS; IMPROVEMENTS; COORDINATION; PLASTICITY; DURATION;
D O I
10.1177/0269215511410580
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100232 [康复医学];
摘要
Objective: We investigated the effect of long-term practice on motor improvements in chronic stroke patients. Design: Randomized parallel group controlled study. Setting: Motor Behavior Laboratory, University of Florida. Subjects: Eighteen individuals who experienced a stroke more than nine months prior to enrolling. Interventions: The treatment interventions were bilateral arm movements coupled with active neuromuscular stimulation on the impaired arm for both practice duration groups. The short-term group received one treatment protocol, whereas, over 16 months, the long-term practice group completed 10 treatment protocols. All protocol sessions were 6 hours long (90 minutes 1 day/week/4 weeks) and were separated by 22 days. Main outcome measures: Repeated data collection on three primary outcome measures (i.e. Box and Block test, fractionated reaction times, and sustained force production) evaluated motor capabilities across rehabilitation times. Results: Mixed design ANOVAs (Group x Retention Test: 2 x 4; Group x Retention Test x Arm Condition: 2 x 4 x 2) revealed improved motor capabilities for the long-term practice duration group on each primary measure. At the 16-month delayed retention test, when compared to the short-term group, the long-term group demonstrated: (a) more blocks moved (43 v 32), (b) faster premotor reaction times (158 v 208 ms), and (c) higher force production (75 v 45 N). Conclusion: Sixty hours of rehabilitation over 16 months provided by various bilateral arm movements and coupled active stimulation improved motor capabilities in chronic stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:1086 / 1096
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Altman DG, 1999, BRIT MED J, V318, P1209
[2]
Statistics notes - Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7310) :446-447
[3]
Statistics notes - How to randomise [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7211) :703-704
[4]
PREMOTOR AND MOTOR COMPONENTS OF REACTION TIME [J].
BOTWINICK, J ;
THOMPSON, LW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 71 (01) :9-+
[5]
Chronic stroke longitudinal motor improvements: Cumulative learning evidence found in the upper extremity [J].
Cauraugh, James H. ;
Kim, Sang-Bum ;
Summers, Jeffery J. .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2008, 25 (1-2) :115-121
[6]
Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: A structured review and meta-analysis [J].
Cauraugh, James H. ;
Lodha, Neha ;
Naik, Sagar K. ;
Summers, Jeffery J. .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 29 (05) :853-870
[7]
Upper extremity improvements in chronic stroke: Coupled bilateral load training [J].
Cauraugh, James H. ;
Coombes, Stephen A. ;
Lodha, Neha ;
Naik, Sagar K. ;
Summers, Jeffery J. .
RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 27 (01) :17-25
[8]
Coupled bilateral movements and active neuromuscular stimulation: Intralimb transfer evidence during bimanual aiming [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, SB ;
Duley, A .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2005, 382 (1-2) :39-44
[9]
Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Summers, JJ .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2005, 75 (05) :309-320
[10]
Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 215 (1-2) :13-19