Population-based assessment of surgical treatment trends for patients with melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy

被引:69
作者
Cormier, JN [1 ]
Xing, Y [1 ]
Ding, MC [1 ]
Lee, JE [1 ]
Mansfield, PF [1 ]
Gershenwald, JE [1 ]
Ross, MI [1 ]
Du, XGL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77230 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.21.360
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The surgical staging of melanoma dramatically changed with the introduction of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. In this study, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data were examined to determine how surgical treatment is being carried out and whether SLN biopsy is being performed in melanoma patients in conformance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Patients and Methods The SEER database (1998 to 2001) was searched for all patients with invasive melanoma. NCCN guidelines were used to define optimal stage-specific surgical treatment. Treatment trends in patients with stages I to III disease were summarized, and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with nonadherence with treatment guidelines. Results A total of 21,867 melanoma patients were identified; 18,499 of these patients met the inclusion criteria. The number of patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma increased by 55.7% over the study period, and this corresponded to a 53% increase in the number of SLN biopsies performed annually. The odds ratios for nonadherence were 2.32, 2.27, and 1.54 for stages IB, II, and III disease, respectively, compared with stage IA melanoma. Multivariate analyses revealed that age more than 65 years, marital status, minority populations, and primary tumor location were associated with nonadherence with guidelines. Treatment patterns among tumor registries also varied significantly. Conclusion Stage migration is evident in the SEER registries in consort with increasing use of SLN biopsy. Although treatment trends are improving, SLN biopsy continues to be underused, particularly-in the elderly and minority populations, in patients with truncal and head/neck melanomas, and also in some geographic regions of the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:6054 / 6062
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]   Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: The prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients [J].
Gershenwald, JE ;
Thompson, W ;
Mansfield, PF ;
Lee, JE ;
Colome, MI ;
Tseng, CH ;
Lee, JJ ;
Balch, CM ;
Reintgen, DS ;
Ross, MI .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) :976-983
[32]  
Guadagnoli E, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V83, P302, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980715)83:2<302::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO
[33]  
2-X
[34]   Time trends in systemic adjuvant treatment for node-negative breast cancer [J].
Hébert-Croteau, N ;
Brisson, J ;
Latreille, J ;
Gariépy, G ;
Blanchette, C ;
Deschênes, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) :1458-1464
[35]   Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends [J].
Howe, HL ;
Wingo, PA ;
Thun, MJ ;
Ries, LAG ;
Rosenberg, HM ;
Feigal, EG ;
Edwards, BK .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (11) :824-842
[36]  
KRAKAUER H, 1995, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V110, P2
[37]   Patients with lymphatic metastasis of cutaneous malignant melanoma benefit from sentinel lymphonodectomy and early excision of their nodal disease [J].
Kretschmer, L ;
Hilgers, R ;
Möhrle, M ;
Balda, BR ;
Breuninger, H ;
Konz, B ;
Kunte, C ;
Marsch, WC ;
Neumann, C ;
Starz, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (02) :212-218
[38]   Sociodemographic differences in the receipt of colorectal cancer surveillance care following treatment with curative intent [J].
Lafata, JE ;
Johnson, CC ;
Ben-Menachem, T ;
Morlock, RJ .
MEDICAL CARE, 2001, 39 (04) :361-372
[39]   Follow-up prostate cancer treatments after radical prostatectomy: A population-based study [J].
LuYao, GL ;
Potosky, AL ;
Albertsen, PC ;
Wasson, JH ;
Barry, MJ ;
Wennberg, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (3-4) :166-173
[40]   Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications? [J].
McCarthy, EP ;
Iezzoni, LI ;
Davis, RB ;
Palmer, RH ;
Cahalane, M ;
Hamel, MB ;
Mukamal, K ;
Phillips, RS ;
Davies, DT .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (08) :868-876