Brain electrical source analysis of primary cortical components of the tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential using regional sources

被引:31
作者
Baumgärtner, U
Vogel, H
Ellrich, J
Gawehn, J
Stoeter, P
Treede, RD
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Inst Physiol & Pathophysiol, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Mainz, Inst Neuroradiol, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
来源
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1998年 / 108卷 / 06期
关键词
tibial nerve; somatosensory evoked potential; brain electrical source analysis; primary somatosensory cortex; source localization;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00040-9
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) show higher amplitudes ipsilateral to the side of stimulation, whereas subdural recordings revealed a source in the foot area of the contralateral hemisphere. We now investigated this paradoxical lateralization by performing a brain electrical source analysis in the P40 time window (34-46 ms). The tibial nerve was stimulated behind the ankle (8 subjects). On each side, 2048 stimuli were applied twice. SEPs were recorded using 32 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-verified electrode positions (bandpass 0.5-500 Hz). In each case, the P40 amplitude was higher ipsilaterally (0.45 +/- 0.14 mu V) than contralaterally (-0.49 +/- 0.16 mu V). The best fitting regional source, however, was always located in the contralateral hemisphere with a mean distance of 8.2 +/- 4.3 mm from the midline. The positivity pointed ipsilaterally shifting from a frontal orientation (P37) to a parietal direction (P40). The P40 dipole moment was 2.5 times stronger than the dipole moment of P37, which makes P40 most prominent in EEG recordings. However, with its oblique dipole orientation compared to the tangential P37 dipole, it is systematically underestimated in MEG. Dipole orientations explained interindividual variability of scalp potential distribution. SEP amplitudes were smaller when generated in the dominant (left) hemisphere. This is explained by deeper located sources (5.4 +/- 1.6 mm) with a more tangential orientation (Delta theta = 17.5 +/- 2.3 degrees) in the left hemisphere. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 599
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   THE EARLY NEGATIVE POTENTIAL EVOKED BY STIMULATION OF THE TIBIAL NERVE IN MAN [J].
BERIC, A ;
PREVEC, TS .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 50 (02) :299-306
[2]  
Buchner H, 1995, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V35, P207
[3]  
Buchner Helmut, 1994, Brain Topography, V6, P299, DOI 10.1007/BF01211175
[4]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CUTANEOUS AND MUSCLE AFFERENT-PROJECTIONS TO CEREBRAL-CORTEX IN MAN [J].
BURKE, D ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
MCKEON, B ;
SKUSE, NF .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 53 (04) :349-360
[5]   MEG VERSUS EEG LOCALIZATION TEST USING IMPLANTED SOURCES IN THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
COHEN, D ;
CUFFIN, BN ;
YUNOKUCHI, K ;
MANIEWSKI, R ;
PURCELL, C ;
COSGROVE, GR ;
IVES, J ;
KENNEDY, JG ;
SCHOMER, DL .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 28 (06) :811-817
[6]   PARADOXICAL LATERALIZATION OF CORTICAL POTENTIALS-EVOKED BY STIMULATION OF POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE [J].
CRUSE, R ;
KLEM, G ;
LESSER, RP ;
LUEDERS, H .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1982, 39 (04) :222-225
[7]   COLOR IMAGING OF PARIETAL AND FRONTAL SOMATOSENSORY POTENTIAL FIELDS EVOKED BY STIMULATION OF MEDIAN OR POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE IN MAN [J].
DESMEDT, JE ;
BOURGUET, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (01) :1-17
[8]   PROJECTION OF THENAR MUSCLE AFFERENTS TO FRONTAL AND PARIETAL CORTEX OF HUMAN-SUBJECTS [J].
GANDEVIA, SC ;
BURKE, D .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 77 (05) :353-361
[9]   BIT-MAPPED IMAGING OF SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS AFTER STIMULATION OF THE POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVES AND DORSAL NERVE OF THE PENIS CLITORIS [J].
GUERIT, JM ;
OPSOMER, RJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 80 (03) :228-237
[10]   Time-varying activation of different cytoarchitectonic areas of the human SI cortex after tibial nerve stimulation [J].
Hari, R ;
Nagamine, T ;
Nishitani, N ;
Mikuni, N ;
Sato, T ;
Tarkiainen, A ;
Shibasaki, H .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (02) :111-118