Phase III Trial of Vandetanib Compared With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

被引:238
作者
Natale, Ronald B. [1 ]
Thongprasert, Sumitra
Greco, F. Anthony
Thomas, Michael
Tsai, Chun-Ming
Sunpaweravong, Patrapim
Ferry, David
Mulatero, Clive
Whorf, Robert
Thompson, Joyce
Barlesi, Fabrice
Langmuir, Peter
Gogov, Sven
Rowbottom, Jacqui A.
Goss, Glenwood D.
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Outpatient Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
JAPANESE PATIENTS; TYROSINE KINASE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ZD6474; GEFITINIB; DOCETAXEL; INHIBITOR; BEVACIZUMAB; CARBOPLATIN; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5981
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. This phase III study assessed the efficacy of vandetanib versus erlotinib in unselected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment failure with one to two prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Patients and Methods One thousand two hundred forty patients were randomly assigned to receive vandetanib 300 mg/d (n = 623) or erlotinib 150 mg/d (n = 617). The primary objective was to show superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) for vandetanib versus erlotinib. If the difference did not reach statistical significance for superiority, a noninferiority analysis was conducted. Results There was no significant improvement in PFS for patients treated with vandetanib versus erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95.22% CI, 0.87 to 1.10; P = .721); median PFS was 2.6 months for vandetanib and 2.0 months for erlotinib. There was also no significant difference for the secondary end points of overall survival (HR, 1.01; P = .830), objective response rate (both 12%), and time to deterioration of symptoms for pain (HR, 0.92; P = .289), dyspnea (HR, 1.07; P = .407), and cough (HR, 0.94; P = .455). Both agents showed equivalent PFS and overall survival in a preplanned noninferiority analysis. Adverse events (AEs; any grade) more frequent with vandetanib than erlotinib included diarrhea (50% v 38%, respectively) and hypertension (16% v 2%, respectively); rash was more frequent with erlotinib than vandetanib (38% v 28%, respectively). The overall incidence of grade = 3 AEs was also higher with vandetanib than erlotinib (50% v 40%, respectively). Conclusion In patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC, vandetanib showed antitumor activity but did not demonstrate an efficacy advantage compared with erlotinib. There was a higher incidence of some AEs with vandetanib. J Clin Oncol 29:1059-1066. (c) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1066
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
[Anonymous], J THORAC ONCOL
[3]   THE EORTC QLQ-LC13 - A MODULAR SUPPLEMENT TO THE EORTC CORE QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE (QLQ-C30) FOR USE IN LUNG-CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BERGMAN, B ;
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
KAASA, S ;
SULLIVAN, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (05) :635-642
[4]   Symptom improvement in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib: quality of life analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study BR.21 [J].
Bezjak, Andrea ;
Tu, Dongsheng ;
Seymour, Lesley ;
Clark, Gary ;
Trajkovic, Aleksandra ;
Zukin, Mauro ;
Ayoub, Joseph ;
Lago, Sergio ;
de Albuquerque Ribeiro, Ronaldo ;
Gerogianni, Alexandra ;
Cyjon, Arnold ;
Noble, Jonathan ;
Laberge, Francis ;
Chan, Raymond Tsz-Tong ;
Fenton, David ;
von Pawel, Joachim ;
Reck, Martin ;
Shepherd, Frances A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (24) :3831-3837
[5]  
Carlomagno F, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P7284
[6]   Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens [J].
Fossella, FV ;
DeVore, R ;
Kerr, RN ;
Crawford, J ;
Natale, RR ;
Dunphy, F ;
Kalman, L ;
Miller, V ;
Lee, JS ;
Moore, M ;
Gandara, D ;
Karp, D ;
Vokes, E ;
Kris, M ;
Kim, Y ;
Gamza, F ;
Hammershaimb, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (12) :2354-2362
[7]   Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Fukuoka, M ;
Yano, S ;
Giaccone, G ;
Tamura, T ;
Nakagawa, K ;
Douillard, JY ;
Nishiwaki, Y ;
Vansteenkiste, J ;
Kudoh, S ;
Rischin, D ;
Eek, R ;
Horai, T ;
Noda, K ;
Takata, I ;
Smit, E ;
Averbuch, S ;
Macleod, A ;
Feyereislova, A ;
Dong, RP ;
Baselga, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (12) :2237-2246
[8]   Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy [J].
Hanna, N ;
Shepherd, FA ;
Fossella, FV ;
Pereira, JR ;
De Marinis, F ;
von Pawel, J ;
Gatzemeier, U ;
Tsao, TCY ;
Pless, M ;
Muller, T ;
Lim, HL ;
Desch, C ;
Szondy, K ;
Gervais, R ;
Shaharyar ;
Manegold, C ;
Paul, S ;
Paoletti, P ;
Einhorn, L ;
Bunn, PA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (09) :1589-1597
[9]   Toxicities of antiangiogenic therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Herbst, Roy S. .
CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2006, 8 :S23-S30
[10]   Clinical evaluation of ZD6474, an orally active inhibitor of VEGF and EGF receptor signaling, in patients with solid, malignant tumors [J].
Holden, SN ;
Eckhardt, SG ;
Basser, R ;
de Boer, R ;
Rischin, D ;
Green, M ;
Rosenthal, MA ;
Wheeler, C ;
Barge, A ;
Hurwitz, HI .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (08) :1391-1397