Review of evidence and explanations for suboptimal screening and treatment of dyslipidemia in women - A conceptual model

被引:41
作者
Kim, C
Hofer, TP
Kerr, EA
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Ann Arbor VA Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes R, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
cardiac; disparity; outpatient; cholesterol; women;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20910.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Screening and treatment rates for dyslipidemia in populations at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are inappropriately low and rates among women may be lower than among men. We conducted a review of the literature for possible explanations of these observed gender differences and categorized the evidence in terms of a conceptual model that we describe. Factors related to physicians' attitudes and knowledge, the patient's priorities and characteristics, and the health care systems in which they interact are all likely to play important roles in determining screening rates, but are not well understood. Research and interventions that simultaneously consider the influence of patient, clinician, and health system factors, and particularly research that focuses on modifiable mechanisms, will help us understand the causes of the observed gender differences and lead to improvements in cholesterol screening and management in high-risk women. For example, patient and physician preferences for lipid and other CVD risk factor management have not been well studied, particularly in relation to other gender-specific screening issues, costs of therapy, and by degree of CVD risk; better understanding of how available health plan benefits interact with these preferences could lead to structural changes in benefits that might improve screening and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 863
页数:10
相关论文
共 133 条
[61]  
Kerr EA, 2001, AM J MANAG CARE, V7, P1033
[62]  
KESSLER RC, 1994, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V51, P8
[63]   Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities [J].
Krein, SL ;
Hofer, TP ;
Kerr, EA ;
Hayward, RA .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 37 (05) :1159-1180
[64]  
LaBresh KA, 2000, AM J CARDIOL, V85, p23A
[65]   A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care [J].
Landon, BE ;
Wilson, IB ;
Cleary, PD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (17) :1377-1382
[66]   Toward better therapy at hypercholesterolemia [J].
Laubach, E ;
Otto, C ;
Schwandt, P .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (17) :2685-2686
[67]   Time trends in the use of cholesterol-lowering agents in older adults - The Cardiovascular Health Study [J].
Lemaitre, RN ;
Furberg, CD ;
Newman, AB ;
Hulley, SB ;
Gordon, DJ ;
Gottdiener, JS ;
McDonald, RH ;
Psaty, BM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (16) :1761-1768
[68]   Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in women after myocardial infarction: The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial [J].
Lewis, SJ ;
Sacks, FM ;
Mitchell, JS ;
East, C ;
Glasser, S ;
Kell, S ;
Letterer, R ;
Limacher, M ;
Moye, LA ;
Rouleau, JL ;
Pfeffer, MA ;
Braunwald, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) :140-146
[69]   How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record [J].
Luck, J ;
Peabody, JW ;
Dresselhaus, TR ;
Lee, M ;
Glassman, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 108 (08) :642-649
[70]   SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND CORONARY HEART-DISEASE RISK FACTOR TRENDS - THE MINNESOTA-HEART-SURVEY [J].
LUEPKER, RV ;
ROSAMOND, WD ;
MURPHY, R ;
SPRAFKA, JM ;
FOLSOM, AR ;
MCGOVERN, PG ;
BLACKBURN, H .
CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (05) :2172-2179