Automated extraction of viral-pathogen RNA and DNA for high-throughput quantitative real-time PCR

The performance of the m1000 system (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois) as a front-end extraction system for high-throughput "in-house" quantitative real-time PCR assays was analyzed and compared to that of manual extraction of plasma and serum samples (hepatitis C virus [HCV] and hepatitis B virus [HBV]) and EDTA-blood samples (cytomegalovirus [CMV] and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]). Linearity of extraction was tested on dilution series of HCV and HBV reference materials. The correlation coefficient for standard curves based on repeated extraction runs was 0.97 +/- 0.06 for HCV and 0.97 +/- 0.03 for HBV, indicating a linear extraction from 100 to 1.0 x 10(5) HCV IU/ml and from 100 to 1.0 x 10(6) HBV IU/ml. Intra- and interrun variability was below 0.23 log(10) IU/ml for 2.98 to 5.28 log(10) HCV IU/ml and 2.70 to 5.20 log(10) HBV IU/ml. Correlation between automated and manual extraction was very good. For HCV, the correlation coefficient was 0.91 and the mean difference in viral load was 0.13 log(10) HCV IU/ml. For HBV, the correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the mean difference in viral load 0.61 log(10) HBV IU/ml. For CMW and EBV, the correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the mean difference in viral load 0.33 log(10) copies/ml. Accuracy was confirmed with a reference panel (QCMD, Glasgow, Scotland) for all four assays. No cross-contamination was observed when extracting strongly positive polyomavirus samples (8.10 log(10) copies/ml) interspersed with polyomavirus-negative samples. Automated extraction via the m1000 system offers a high reliability of extraction and resulted in a strong reduction of the required extraction hands-on time for high-throughput PCR compared to manual extraction protocols.