Ovarian follicular wave synchronization and induction of ovulation in postpartum beef cows

被引:30
作者
Rivera, GM
Goñi, CG
Chaves, MA
Ferrero, SB
Bo, GA
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Rio Cuarto, Fac Ciencias Exactas Fis Quim & Nat, Dept Matemat, RA-5800 Rio Cuarto, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Rio Cuarto, Fac Agron & Vet, Dept Reprod Anim, RA-5800 Rio Cuarto, Argentina
[3] Inst Reprod Anim Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
beef cows; postpartum anestrus; follicular dynamics; ovulation induction;
D O I
10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00083-1
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
An experiment was designed to evaluate a) the effect of a progesterone-estradiol combined treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics in postpartum beef cows, and b) ovulation and the subsequent luteal activity after short-term calf removal and GnRH agonist treatment. Multiparous Angus cows (25 to 40 d after calving) were assigned to the following treatments: untreated (Control, n=9); short term calf removal (CR, n=8); progesterone (CIDR, n=9) and progesterone plus estradiol-17 beta (CIDR+E-17 beta, n=9). Progesterone treatment (CIDR) lasted 8 d and the day of device insertion was considered as Day 0. Cows in the CIDR+E-17 beta group also received an im injection of 5 mg of E-17 beta on Day 1. On Day 8, calves were removed for 48 h (CII CIDR and CIDR+E-17 beta groups) and 6 h before the end of calf removal these cows also received an im injection of 8 mu g of Busereline (GnRH). Anestrus was confirmed in all cows by the absence of luteal tissue and progesterone concentrations below 1 ng ml(-1) at the beginning of the experiment. Although mean (+/-SEM) interval from the beginning of the experiment (Day 0) to wave emergence did not differ (P>0.05) among treatment groups(Control, 1.9 +/- 1.0, range -2 to 7 d; CR 3.9 +/- 0.7, range 0 to 6 d; CIDR, 2.8 +/- 0.5, range 0 to 4 d and CIDR+E-17 beta, 4.1 +/- 0.2, range 3 to 5), the variability was less (P<0.05) in the CIDR+E-17 beta group. The proportion of cows ovulating 24 to 48 h after GnRH administration tended (P=0.08) to be higher in cows from CIDR+E-17 beta group (8/9) than in those of CR (5/8) or CIDR (6/9) groups, respectively and was associated with a higher proportion (P<0.05) of CIDR+E-17 beta treated cows (9/9) that had a dominant follicle in the growing/early static phase at the time of GnRH treatment compared to the other GnRH treated groups (5/8, and 4/9 for CR and CIDR groups, respectively). Two CR cows ovulated 0-24 h after GnRH and only one Control cow ovulated the day before the time of GnRH administration. Cows pretreated with progesterone had longer (P<0.05) luteal lifespan (CIDR, 14.5 +/- 0.7, CIDR+E-17 beta, 13.9 +/- 0.6 d) than those not treated with CIDR (Control, 5, CR, 4.0 +/- 0.4). We conclude that progesterone plus estradiol treatment results in tightly synchronized wave emergence and high GnRH-induced ovulation rate with normal luteal activity in postpartum beef cattle. (C) 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1365 / 1375
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]  
EDWARDS S, 1983, J REPROD FERTIL, V69, P65, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0690065
[12]   FOLLICULAR DYNAMICS DURING THE BOVINE ESTROUS-CYCLE - A LIMITING FACTOR IN IMPROVEMENT OF FERTILITY [J].
FORTUNE, JE .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (1-4) :111-125
[13]   MECHANISMS ASSOCIATED WITH CORPUS-LUTEUM LIFE-SPAN IN ANIMALS HAVING NORMAL OR SUBNORMAL LUTEAL FUNCTION [J].
GARVERICK, HA ;
ZOLLERS, WG ;
SMITH, MF .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1992, 28 (1-4) :111-124
[14]   COMPOSITION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF FOLLICULAR WAVES DURING THE BOVINE ESTROUS-CYCLE [J].
GINTHER, OJ ;
KASTELIC, JP ;
KNOPF, L .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1989, 20 (03) :187-200
[15]   Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle [J].
Ginther, OJ ;
Wiltbank, MC ;
Fricke, PM ;
Gibbons, JR ;
Kot, K .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1996, 55 (06) :1187-1194
[16]  
HABICH GE, 1974, PROD ANIM, V5, P111
[17]   CHARACTERIZATION OF HORMONAL PATTERNS IN THE BEEF COW DURING POSTPARTUM ANESTRUS [J].
HUMPHREY, WD ;
KALTENBACH, CC ;
DUNN, TG ;
KORITNIK, DR ;
NISWENDER, GD .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1983, 56 (02) :445-453
[18]  
Inskeep E K, 1995, J Reprod Fertil Suppl, V49, P493
[19]  
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censos INDEC, 1988, CENS NAC AGR
[20]  
JAGGER JP, 1987, J REPROD FERTIL, V80, P263, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0800263