The IQCODE Versus a Single-Item Informant Measure to Discriminate Between Cognitively Intact Individuals and Individuals With Dementia or Cognitive Impairment

被引:16
作者
Ayalon, Liat [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Louis & Gabi Weisfeld Sch Social Work, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
screening; dementia; cognitive impairment; psychometrics; OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; ELDERLY IQCODE; DECLINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; MEMORY; STATE; AREAS;
D O I
10.1177/0891988711418506
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
The present study evaluated the short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE 2-year version) against a single item concerning informant's perception of patient's memory, as screening tools for CIND not dementia (CIND) and dementia. Data were drawn from the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study, which is a national study that was specifically designed to provide population-based estimates of cognitive impairment and dementia in the United States. The study employed a comprehensive dementia evaluation that yielded an expert consensus-based diagnosis. Receiver-operating curves, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated. Both the IQCODE and the single-item instrument demonstrated only mild-to-moderate abilities to discriminate between cognitively intact individuals and individuals with CIND. Whereas the ability of the IQCODE to discriminate between cognitively intact individuals and individuals with dementia was moderate, the single-item instrument showed an adequate ability to distinguish between cognitively intact individuals and individuals with dementia. Therefore, for screening purposes, asking informants a single question concerning patients' memory is sufficient. However, if additional data concerning patients' strengths and weaknesses are needed, the IQCODE may be desirable.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 173
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Development and Validation of a Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool The Sweet 16 [J].
Fong, Tamara G. ;
Jones, Richard N. ;
Rudolph, James L. ;
Yang, Frances M. ;
Tommet, Douglas ;
Habtemariam, Daniel ;
Marcantonio, Edward R. ;
Langa, Kenneth M. ;
Inouye, Sharon K. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 171 (05) :432-437
[12]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[13]   Cognitive Enhancement: Promises and Perils [J].
Hyman, Steven E. .
NEURON, 2011, 69 (04) :595-598
[14]   Discriminative and predictive power of an informant report in mild cognitive impairment [J].
Isella, V ;
Villa, L ;
Russo, A ;
Regazzoni, R ;
Ferrarese, C ;
Appollonio, IM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 77 (02) :166-171
[15]   Accommodating covariates in receiver operating characteristic analysis [J].
Janes, Holly ;
Longton, Gary ;
Pepe, Margaret S. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01) :17-39
[16]   The cost of diagnosing dementia in a community setting [J].
Jedenius, Erik ;
Wimo, Anders ;
Stromqvist, Jan ;
Jonsson, Linus ;
Andreasen, Niels .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 25 (05) :476-482
[17]   THE INFORMANT QUESTIONNAIRE ON COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE ELDERLY (IQCODE) - SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CORRELATES, RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND SOME NORMS [J].
JORM, AF ;
JACOMB, PA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1989, 19 (04) :1015-1022
[18]   A SHORT-FORM OF THE INFORMANT QUESTIONNAIRE ON COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE ELDERLY (IQCODE) - DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION [J].
JORM, AF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (01) :145-153
[19]   The informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): a review [J].
Jorm, AF .
INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2004, 16 (03) :275-293
[20]   The aging, demographics, and memory study: Study design and methods [J].
Langa, KM ;
Plassman, BL ;
Wallace, RB ;
Herzog, AR ;
Heeringa, SG ;
Ofstedal, MB ;
Burke, JR ;
Fisher, GG ;
Fultz, NH ;
Hurd, MD ;
Potter, GG ;
Rodgers, WL ;
Steffens, DC ;
Weir, DR ;
Willis, RJ .
NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 25 (04) :181-191