Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during a maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device

被引:222
作者
Richard, R [1 ]
Lonsdorfer-Wolf, E [1 ]
Charloux, A [1 ]
Doutreleau, S [1 ]
Buchheit, M [1 ]
Oswald-Mammosser, M [1 ]
Lampert, E [1 ]
Mettauer, B [1 ]
Geny, B [1 ]
Lonsdorfer, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Hop Civil, Serv Explorat Fonctionnelles Resp Cardiocirculat, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
关键词
impedance; cardiography; cardiac output; maximal exercise test;
D O I
10.1007/s004210100458
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
One of the greatest challenges in exercise physiology is to develop a valid, reliable, non-invasive and affordable measurement of cardiac output (CO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of a new impedance cardiograph device, the Physio Flow, during a 1-min step incremental exercise test from rest to maximal peak effort. A group of 12 subjects was evaluated to determine the reproducibility of the method as follows: (1) each subject performed two comparable tests while their CO was measured by impedance cardiography using the new device (COImp1, COImp2), and (2) in a subgroup of 7 subjects CO was also determined by the direct Fick method (COFick) during the second test. The mean difference between the values obtained by impedance (i.e. COImp1-COImp2) was -0.009 1.min(-1) (95% confidence interval: -4.2 1.min(-1), 4.2 1.min(-1)), and CO ranged from 3.55 1.min(-1) to 26.75 1.min(-1) (n=146). When expressed as a percentage, the difference (COImp1-COImp2) did not vary with increasing CO. The correlation coefficient between the values of COImp and COFick obtained during the second exercise test was r=0.94 (P<0.01, n=50). The mean difference expressed as percentage was -2.78% (95% confidence interval: -27.44%, 21.78%). We conclude that COImp provides a clinically acceptable evaluation of CO in healthy subjects during an incremental exercise.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 207
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Berstein DP, 1986, CRIT CARE MED, V14, P904
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Bloch KE, 1997, AM J CARDIOL, V79, P846
[4]   A new impedance cardiograph device for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the "direct" Fick method [J].
Charloux, A ;
Lonsdorfer-Wolf, E ;
Richard, R ;
Lampert, E ;
Oswald-Mammosser, M ;
Mettauer, B ;
Geny, B ;
Lonsdorfer, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 82 (04) :313-320
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT DURING EXERCISE [J].
COATES, AL .
CHEST, 1992, 102 (04) :985-986
[6]  
FAGARD R, 1990, EUR HEART J, V11, P1
[7]  
GRENVIK A, 1996, SCAND J CLIN LAB INV, V18, P486
[8]  
HANSEN JE, 1984, AM REV RESPIR DIS S, V129, P49
[9]   A REVIEW OF IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY [J].
JENSEN, L ;
YAKIMETS, J ;
TEO, KK .
HEART & LUNG, 1995, 24 (03) :183-193
[10]  
KUBICEK WG, 1966, AEROSPACE MED, V37, P1208