Economic evaluation of end stage renal disease treatment

被引:168
作者
de Wit, GA
Ramsteijn, PG
de Charro, FT
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy & Law, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Renal Replacement Registry Netherlands, RENINE, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
end stage renal disease; cost-analysis; cost-effectiveness-analysis; cost-utility-analysis; quality of life; health policy;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00017-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines the cost-effectiveness of end stage renal disease (ESRD) treatments. Empirical data on costs of treatment modalities and quality of life of patients were gathered alongside a clinical trial and combined with data on patient and technique survival from the Dutch Renal Replacement Registry. A Markov-chain model, based on the actual Dutch ESRD program as of January 1st 1997, predicted the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of dialysis and transplantation over the 5-year period 1997-2001. Total annual costs amounted to DFL 650 million (1.1% of the health care budget). Centre Haemodialysis was found to be the least cost-effective treatment, while transplantation and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) were the most cost-effective treatments. The Markov-chain model was used to study the influence of substitutive policies on the overall cost-effectiveness of the ESRD treatment program. The influence of such policies was found to be modest in the Dutch context, where a high percentage of patients is already being treated with mon cost-effective treatment modalities. In countries where Centre Haemodialysis is still the only or the major treatment option for ESRD patients, substitutive policies might have a more substantial impact on cost-effectiveness of ESRD treatment. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 232
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   THE MARKOV PROCESS IN MEDICAL PROGNOSIS [J].
BECK, JR ;
PAUKER, SG .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1983, 3 (04) :419-458
[2]   WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
SUTHERLAND, HJ ;
HEASMAN, KZ ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
CUMMINGS, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :58-67
[3]   QUALITY OF LIFE IN END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE - A REEXAMINATION [J].
BREMER, BA ;
MCCAULEY, CR ;
WRONA, RM ;
JOHNSON, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1989, 13 (03) :200-209
[4]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[5]  
BURGER H, 1994, THESIS U MAASTRICHT
[6]   COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM HEMODIALYSIS FOR CHRONIC RENAL-FAILURE [J].
BUXTON, MJ ;
WEST, RR .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 2 (5967) :376-379
[7]   A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS AND HOSPITAL HEMODIALYSIS [J].
CHURCHILL, DN ;
LEMON, BC ;
TORRANCE, GW .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1984, 4 (04) :489-500
[8]  
CHURCHILL DN, 1987, CLIN INVEST MED, V10, P14
[9]  
*COOP LYBR, 1996, COST CHRON HAEM
[10]   An economic evaluation of hospital-based hemodialysis and home-based peritoneal dialysis for pediatric patients [J].
Coyte, PC ;
Young, LG ;
Tipper, BL ;
Mitchell, VM ;
Stoffman, PR ;
Willumsen, J ;
Geary, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1996, 27 (04) :557-565