Economic evaluation of end stage renal disease treatment

被引:168
作者
de Wit, GA
Ramsteijn, PG
de Charro, FT
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy & Law, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Renal Replacement Registry Netherlands, RENINE, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
end stage renal disease; cost-analysis; cost-effectiveness-analysis; cost-utility-analysis; quality of life; health policy;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00017-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines the cost-effectiveness of end stage renal disease (ESRD) treatments. Empirical data on costs of treatment modalities and quality of life of patients were gathered alongside a clinical trial and combined with data on patient and technique survival from the Dutch Renal Replacement Registry. A Markov-chain model, based on the actual Dutch ESRD program as of January 1st 1997, predicted the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of dialysis and transplantation over the 5-year period 1997-2001. Total annual costs amounted to DFL 650 million (1.1% of the health care budget). Centre Haemodialysis was found to be the least cost-effective treatment, while transplantation and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) were the most cost-effective treatments. The Markov-chain model was used to study the influence of substitutive policies on the overall cost-effectiveness of the ESRD treatment program. The influence of such policies was found to be modest in the Dutch context, where a high percentage of patients is already being treated with mon cost-effective treatment modalities. In countries where Centre Haemodialysis is still the only or the major treatment option for ESRD patients, substitutive policies might have a more substantial impact on cost-effectiveness of ESRD treatment. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 232
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Randomized, prospective trial of cyclosporine monotherapy versus azathioprine-prednisone from three months after renal transplantation [J].
Hilbrands, LB ;
Hoitsma, AJ ;
Koene, RAP .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 61 (07) :1038-1046
[22]  
*HLTH COUNC NETH, 1986, ADV DIAL REN TRANSPL
[23]   COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS APPLIED TO TREATMENT OF CHRONIC RENAL DISEASE [J].
KLARMAN, HE ;
FRANCIS, JO ;
ROSENTHAL, GD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1968, 6 (01) :48-54
[24]   A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation [J].
Laupacis, A ;
Keown, P ;
Pus, N ;
Krueger, H ;
Ferguson, B ;
Wong, C ;
Muirhead, N .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 50 (01) :235-242
[25]   A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC-RENAL-FAILURE [J].
LUDBROOK, A .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1981, 13 (03) :337-350
[26]   Quality of life in patients on chronic dialysis: Self-assessment 3 months after the start of treatment [J].
Merkus, MP ;
Jager, KJ ;
Dekker, FW ;
Boeschoten, EW ;
Stevens, P ;
Krediet, RT ;
Boekhout, M ;
Barendregt, J ;
Buller, HR ;
deCharro, FT ;
vanEs, A ;
vanGeelen, JACA ;
Geerlings, W ;
Gerlag, PGG ;
Gorgels, JPMC ;
Huisman, RM ;
KoningMulder, WAH ;
Koolen, MI ;
Leunissen, KML ;
vanLeusen, R ;
Parlevliet, KJ ;
Schroder, CH ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Valentijn, RM ;
Vincent, HH ;
Vos, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 29 (04) :584-592
[27]  
Michel BC, 1996, HEALTH ECON, V5, P307, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<307::AID-HEC214>3.0.CO
[28]  
2-4
[29]   PROLONGED SURVIVAL OF HUMAN-KIDNEY HOMOGRAFTS BY IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUG THERAPY [J].
MURRAY, JE ;
HARRISON, JH ;
DAMMIN, GJ ;
WILSON, RE ;
MERRILL, JP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1963, 268 (24) :1315-&
[30]   CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS [J].
POPOVICH, RP ;
MONCRIEF, JW ;
NOLPH, KD ;
GHODS, AJ ;
TWARDOWSKI, ZJ ;
PYLE, WK .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1978, 88 (04) :449-456