Advanced tokamak scenario developments for the next step

被引:33
作者
Joffrin, E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] EFDA JET CSU, Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England
[2] CEA Cadarache, DSM DRFC, EURATOM Assoc, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0741-3335/49/12B/S59
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The objective of advanced tokamak scenario research is to provide a candidate plasma scenario for continuous operation in a fusion power plant. The optimization of the self-generated non-inductive current by the bootstrap mechanism up to a level of 50% and above using high plasma pressure and improved confinement are the necessary conditions to achieve this goal. The two main candidate scenarios for continuous operation, the steady state scenario and long duration (up to 3000 s) high neutron fluency scenario (the hybrid scenario), both face physics challenges in terms of confinement, stability, power exhaust and plasma control. Resistive wall modes and Alfvenic fast ion driven instabilities are the main limitations for operating the steady state scenario at high pressure and low magnetic shear. In addition, this scenario demands a high degree of control over the plasma current and pressure profile and the steady state heat load on in-vessel plasma facing components. Understanding the confinement properties of hybrid scenario is still an outstanding issue as well as its modelling for ITER in particular with regard to the H-mode pedestal parameters. This scenario will also require active current profile control, although, less demanding than for the steady state scenario. To operate advanced tokamak scenario, broad current and pressure profile control appears as a necessary requirement on ITER actuators, in addition to the tools required for instability control such as error field coils or electron cyclotron current drive.
引用
收藏
页码:B629 / B649
页数:21
相关论文
共 119 条
[11]   Tests of causality:: Experimental evidence that sheared ExB flow alters turbulence and transport in tokamaks [J].
Burrell, KH .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1999, 6 (12) :4418-4435
[12]  
Burrell KH, 2003, NUCL FUSION, V43, P1555, DOI 10.1088/0029-5515/43/12/003
[13]  
BUTTERY RB, 2007, P 34 EPS C PLASM PHY
[14]   HIGH BOOTSTRAP CURRENT ICRH PLASMAS IN JET [J].
CHALLIS, CD ;
HENDER, TC ;
OROURKE, J ;
ALIARSHAD, S ;
ALPER, B ;
DEBLANK, HJ ;
DELIYANAKIS, N ;
GIMBLETT, CG ;
HAN, J ;
JACQUINOT, J ;
KRAMER, GJ ;
KERNER, W ;
OBRIEN, DP ;
SMEULDERS, P ;
STAMP, MF ;
STORK, D ;
STUBBERFIELD, PM ;
SUMMERS, DDR ;
TIBONE, F ;
TUBBING, BJD ;
ZWINGMANN, W .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1993, 33 (08) :1097-1105
[15]   The use of internal transport barriers in tokamak plasmas [J].
Challis, CD .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2004, 46 :B23-B40
[16]  
CHALLIS CD, 2007, P 34 EPS C PLASM PHY
[17]   THEORY OF MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC INSTABILITIES EXCITED BY ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN TOKAMAKS [J].
CHEN, L .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1994, 1 (05) :1519-1522
[18]   A review of internal transport barrier physics for steady-state operation of tokamaks [J].
Connor, JW ;
Fukuda, T ;
Garbet, X ;
Gormezano, C ;
Mukhovatov, V ;
Wakatani, M .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2004, 44 (04) :R1-R49
[19]   A review of theories of the L-H transition [J].
Connor, JW ;
Wilson, HR .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2000, 42 (01) :R1-R74
[20]  
CORRE Y, 2007, P 34 EPS C PLASM PHY