Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the Tower of London: fMRI and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception

被引:277
作者
Newman, SD [1 ]
Carpenter, PA [1 ]
Varma, S [1 ]
Just, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Ctr Cognit Brain Imaging, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
planning; fMRI; spatial working memory; problem solving; Tower of London; computational modeling; 4CAPS;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00091-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study triangulates executive planning and visuo-spatial reasoning in the context of the Tower of London (TOL) task by using a variety of methodological approaches. These approaches include functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), functional connectivity analysis, individual difference analysis, and computational modeling. A graded fMRI paradigm compared the brain activation during the solution of problems with varying path lengths: easy (I and 2 moves), moderate (3 and 4 moves) and difficult (5 and 6 moves). There were three central findings regarding the prefrontal cortex: (1) while both the left and right prefrontal cortices were equally involved during the solution of moderate and difficult problems, the activation on the right was differentially attenuated during the solution of the easy problems; (2) the activation observed in the right prefrontal cortex was highly correlated with individual differences in working memory (measured independently by the reading span task); and (3) different patterns of functional connectivity were observed in the left and right prefrontal cortices. Results obtained from the superior parietal region also revealed left/right differences; only the left superior parietal region revealed an effect of difficulty. These fMRI results converged upon two hypotheses: (1) the right prefrontal area may be more involved in the generation of a plan, whereas the left prefrontal area may be more involved in plan execution; and (2) the right superior parietal region is more involved in attention processes while the left homologue is more of a visuo-spatial workspace. A 4CAPS computational model of the cognitive processes and brain activation in the TOL task integrated these hypothesized mechanisms, and provided a reasonably good fit to the observed behavioral and brain activation data. The multiple research approaches presented here converge on a deepening understanding of the combination of perceptual and conceptual processes in this type of visual problem solving. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1668 / 1682
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 1993, RULES MIND
[2]   Neural systems engaged by planning: A PET study of the Tower of London task [J].
Baker, SC ;
Rogers, RD ;
Owen, AM ;
Frith, CD ;
Dolan, RJ ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (06) :515-526
[3]   TIME COURSE EPI OF HUMAN BRAIN-FUNCTION DURING TASK ACTIVATION [J].
BANDETTINI, PA ;
WONG, EC ;
HINKS, RS ;
TIKOFSKY, RS ;
HYDE, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 25 (02) :390-397
[4]   The role of frontopolar cortex in subgoal processing during working memory [J].
Braver, TS ;
Bongiolatti, SR .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 15 (03) :523-536
[5]  
Büchel C, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P1538, DOI 10.1126/science.283.5407.1538
[6]   The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking [J].
Burgess, PW ;
Veitch, E ;
Costello, AD ;
Shallice, T .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2000, 38 (06) :848-863
[7]   Coastal zone production of IO precursors: a 2-dimensional study [J].
Carpenter, LJ ;
Hebestreit, K ;
Platt, U ;
Liss, PS .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2001, 1 :9-18
[8]   Working memory and executive function: evidence from neuroimaging [J].
Carpenter, PA ;
Just, MA ;
Reichle, ED .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) :195-199
[9]   MRI-based topographic parcellation of human neocortex: An anatomically specified method with estimate of reliability [J].
Caviness, VS ;
Meyer, J ;
Makris, N ;
Kennedy, DN .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) :566-587
[10]  
COOPER R, 1999, DEV PROBLEM SOLVING