The problem of rooting rapid radiations

被引:70
作者
Shavit, Liat [1 ]
Penny, David [1 ]
Hendy, Michael D. [1 ]
Holland, Barbara R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Allan Wilson Ctr Mol Ecol & Evolut, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
maximum parsimony; maximum likelihood; misleading zones; neighbor-joining; outgroup rooting; topological bias;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msm178
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There are many examples of groups (such as birds, bees, mammals, multicellular animals, and flowering plants) that have undergone a rapid radiation. In such cases, where there is a combination of short internal and long external branches, correctly estimating and rooting phylogenetic trees is known to be a difficult problem. In this simulation study, we tested the performances of different phylogenetic methods at estimating a tree that models a rapid radiation. We found that maximum likelihood, corrected and uncorrected neighbor-joining, and corrected and uncorrected parsimony, all suffer from biases toward specific tree topologies. In addition, we found that using a single-taxon outgroup to root a tree frequently disrupts an otherwise correct ingroup phylogeny. Moreover, for uncorrected parsimony, we found cases where several individual trees (in which the outgroup was placed incorrectly) were selected more frequently than the correct tree. Even for parameter settings where the correct tree was selected most frequently when using extremely long sequences, for sequences of up to 60,000 nucleotides the incorrectly rooted trees were each selected more frequently than the correct tree. For all the cases tested here, tree estimation using a two taxon outgroup was more accurate than when using a single-taxon outgroup. However, the ingroup was most accurately recovered when no outgroup was used.
引用
收藏
页码:2400 / 2411
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A review of long-branch attraction [J].
Bergsten, J .
CLADISTICS, 2005, 21 (02) :163-193
[2]   Topological bias and inconsistency of maximum likelihood using wrong models [J].
Bruno, WJ ;
Halpern, AL .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 16 (04) :564-566
[3]   CASES IN WHICH PARSIMONY OR COMPATIBILITY METHODS WILL BE POSITIVELY MISLEADING [J].
FELSENSTEIN, J .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1978, 27 (04) :401-410
[4]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 2004, INFERRING PHYLOGENIS
[5]   Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications [J].
Goremykin, VV ;
Holland, B ;
Hirsch-Ernst, KI ;
Hellwig, FH .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2005, 22 (09) :1813-1822
[6]   Four new avian mitochondrial genomes help get to basic evolutionary questions in the late Cretaceous [J].
Harrison, GL ;
McLenachan, PA ;
Phillips, MJ ;
Slack, KE ;
Cooper, A ;
Penny, D .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2004, 21 (06) :974-983
[7]   SPECTRAL-ANALYSIS OF PHYLOGENETIC DATA [J].
HENDY, MD .
JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 1993, 10 (01) :5-24
[8]   A FRAMEWORK FOR THE QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF EVOLUTIONARY TREES [J].
HENDY, MD ;
PENNY, D .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1989, 38 (04) :297-309
[9]   COMPARING TREES WITH PENDANT VERTICES LABELED [J].
HENDY, MD ;
LITTLE, CHC ;
PENNY, D .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1984, 44 (05) :1054-1065
[10]   Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data [J].
Ho, SYW ;
Jermiin, LS .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2004, 53 (04) :623-637