Derivation of climate elasticity of runoff to assess the effects of climate change on annual runoff

被引:215
作者
Yang, Hanbo [1 ]
Yang, Dawen [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LONG-WAVE-RADIATION; UNITED-STATES; VARIABILITY; EVAPORATION; STREAMFLOW; TRENDS; WATER; SENSITIVITY; EQUATION;
D O I
10.1029/2010WR009287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate elasticity of runoff is an important indicator for evaluating the effects of climate change on runoff. Consequently, this paper proposes an analytical derivation of climate elasticity. Based on the mean annual water-energy balance equation, two dimensionless numbers (the elasticities of runoff to precipitation and potential evaporation) were derived. Combining the first-order differential of the Penman equation, the elasticities of runoff to precipitation, net radiation, air temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity were derived to separate the contributions of different climatic variables. The case study was carried out in the Futuo River catchment in the Hai River basin, as well as in 89 catchments of the Hai River and the Yellow River basins of China. Based on the mean annual of climatic variables, the climate elasticity in the Futuo River basin was estimated as follows: precipitation elasticity epsilon(P) = 2: 4, net radiation elasticity epsilon(Rn) = -0.8, air temperature elasticity epsilon(T) = -0.05 degrees C-1, wind speed elasticity epsilon(U) = -0.3, and relative humidity elasticity epsilon(RH) = 0.8. In this catchment, precipitation decrease was mainly responsible for runoff decline, and wind speed decline had the second greatest effect on runoff. In the 89 catchments of the Hai River and the Yellow River basins of China, climate elasticity was estimated as follows: epsilon(P) ranging from 1.6 to 3.9, epsilon(Rn) ranging from -1.9 to -0.3, epsilon(T) ranging from -0.11 to -0.02 degrees C-1, epsilon(U) ranging from -0.8 to -0.1, and epsilon(RH) ranging from 0.2 to 1.9. Additional analysis shows that climate elasticity was sensitive to catchment characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J GEOPHYS RES ATMOS, DOI DOI 10.1029/2008JD011470
[3]   The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff [J].
Arora, VK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 265 (1-4) :164-177
[4]   DERIVABLE FORMULA FOR LONG-WAVE RADIATION FROM CLEAR SKIES [J].
BRUTSAERT, W .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1975, 11 (05) :742-744
[5]  
Budyko M. I., 1974, Climate and life
[6]  
Budyko M.I., 1958, The Heat Balance of the Earth's Surface
[7]   Historical temporal trends of hydro-climatic variables and runoff response to climate variability and their relevance in water resource management in the Hanjiang basin [J].
Chen, Hua ;
Guo, Shenglian ;
Xu, Chong-Yu ;
Singh, Vijay P. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 344 (3-4) :171-184
[8]   Influence of global climate model selection on runoff impact assessment [J].
Chiew, F. H. S. ;
Teng, J. ;
Vaze, J. ;
Kirono, D. G. C. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 379 (1-2) :172-180
[9]   Estimation of rainfall elasticity of streamflow in Australia [J].
Chiew, Francis H. S. .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2006, 51 (04) :613-625
[10]   Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model [J].
Choudhury, BJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 216 (1-2) :99-110