Assessing contrast on MR images

被引:79
作者
Wolff, SD
Balaban, RS
机构
[1] Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, Natl. Heart, Lung, and Blood Inst., National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1061
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); contrast enhancement; pulse sequences; special reports;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988186
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences are frequently judged by their ability to facilitate discrimination between pathologic and normal tissue. Objective analysis is usually based on signal intensity measurements. However, the literature shows disagreement as to how this analysis should be performed. The ability to visually differentiate two objects on the basis of signal intensity depends on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). This parameter, however, can be calculated only by measuring the intensity of photons reaching the eye from two distinct objects and, hence, is display dependent. The signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) is a display-independent parameter that reflects the contrast-generating ability of a pulse sequence. When comparing two imaging sequences, the SDNR is proportional to the CNR, assuming the images being compared are displayed so that corresponding regions have the same intensity (ie, photon fluxes). Because the SDNR is display independent, it should be the preferred parameter for assessing the contrast-generating ability of a pulse sequence. The value and limitations of these parameters are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED SUBTRACTION MR-ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE LOWER-EXTREMITIES - INITIAL EVALUATION WITH A MULTISECTION 2-DIMENSIONAL TIME-OF-FLIGHT SEQUENCE [J].
ADAMIS, MK ;
LI, W ;
WIELOPOLSKI, PA ;
KIM, D ;
SAX, EJ ;
KENT, KC ;
EDELMAN, RR .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (03) :689-695
[2]   UPPER ABDOMINAL PHASE-CONTRAST MR-ANGIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF CINE AND NON-CINE TECHNIQUES [J].
BURKART, DJ ;
JOHNSON, CD .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (01) :101-105
[3]   MR-IMAGING OF THE ABDOMEN WITH A PHASED-ARRAY MULTICOIL - PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-EVALUATION [J].
CAMPEAU, NG ;
JOHNSON, CD ;
FELMLEE, JP ;
RYDBERG, JN ;
BUTTS, RK ;
EHMAN, RL ;
RIEDERER, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) :769-776
[4]   CONTRAST, RESOLUTION, AND DETECTABILITY IN MR IMAGING [J].
CONSTABLE, RT ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (02) :297-303
[5]  
CURRY TS, 1990, CHRISTENSENS PHYSICS
[6]   MUSCULOSKELETAL MR-IMAGING AT 4 T AND AT 1.5 T - COMPARISON OF RELAXATION-TIMES AND IMAGE-CONTRAST [J].
DUEWELL, SH ;
CECKLER, TL ;
ONG, K ;
WEN, H ;
JAFFER, FA ;
CHESNICK, SA ;
BALABAN, RS .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) :551-555
[7]   DETECTION OF LIVER METASTASES - COMPARISON OF SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE-ENHANCED AND UNENHANCED MR-IMAGING ART 1.5 T WITH DYNAMIC CT, INTRAOPERATIVE US, AND PERCUTANEOUS US [J].
HAGSPIEL, KD ;
NEIDL, KFW ;
EICHENBERGER, AC ;
WEDER, W ;
MARINCEK, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) :471-478
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF SIGNAL INTENSITIES IN THE PRESENCE OF NOISE IN MR IMAGES [J].
HENKELMAN, RM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (02) :232-233
[9]  
JOHNS HE, 1974, PHYSICS ENG RADIOLOG, P580
[10]   MEASURING SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIOS IN MR IMAGING [J].
KAUFMAN, L ;
KRAMER, DM ;
CROOKS, LE ;
ORTENDAHL, DA .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (01) :265-267