Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic contact dermatitis group, 1998-2000

被引:85
作者
Wetter, DA
Davis, MDP
Yiannias, JA
Cheng, JF
Connolly, SM
el-Azhary, RA
Farmer, SA
Fett, DD
Johnson, JS
Linehan, DLN
Richardson, DM
Schroeter, AL
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Dermatol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Dermatol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Mayo Clin Contact Dermatitis Grp, Jacksonville, AL USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Dermatol, Jacksonville, AL USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Biostat, Jacksonville, AL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.077
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Patch testing is a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of patients contact dermatitis. A standard series of allergens similar to that used by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) is Used at Mayo Clinic. Objective. Our aim was to report the results of patch testing with a standard series at Mayo Clinic from July 1, 1998. to Dec 31. 2000 and to compare our findings with those of the NACDG, during the same period, Methods: The results Of patch testing with the standard series at Mayo Clinic were examined. Positive reaction rates were compared between Mayo Clinic and the NACDG. Results: During the 30-month period, 1324 Mayo Clinic patients were patch tested with a standard series of allergens (mean, 60 allergens), whereas the NACDG standard series during this period included 50 allergens, Overall, 917 patients (69.3%) had at least one positive reaction and 606 patients (45.8%) had two or more positive reactions, The 10 allergens used both by Mayo Clinic and by the NACDG; that most frequently caused positive reactions were nickel sulfate hexahydrate, balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae) neomycin sulfate, cobalt chloride, fragrance mix. potassium dichromate (0.25%) thimerosal, bacitracin, formaldehyde, and glutaraldehyde, Statistically significant differences ill positive reaction rates(P < 05) were observed for 12 of the 43 allergens common to both Mayo Clinic and the NACDG. Conclusion. With large standard patch test series, one can identify (commonly encountered And potentially relevant contact allergens.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 421
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Albert M R, 1998, Am J Contact Dermat, V9, P207, DOI 10.1016/S1046-199X(98)90030-6
[2]  
Davis Mark D P, 2002, Am J Contact Dermat, V13, P71, DOI 10.1053/ajcd.2002.33329
[3]  
Larkin A, 1998, Am J Contact Dermat, V9, P142, DOI 10.1016/S1046-199X(98)90015-X
[4]  
Marks James G Jr, 2003, Am J Contact Dermat, V14, P59
[5]   North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998 [J].
Marks, JG ;
Belsito, DV ;
DeLeo, VA ;
Fowler, JF ;
Fransway, AF ;
Maibach, HI ;
Mathias, CGT ;
Pratt, MD ;
Rietschel, RL ;
Sherertz, EF ;
Storrs, FJ ;
Taylor, JS .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 136 (02) :272-273
[6]   North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens [J].
Marks, JG ;
Belsito, DV ;
DeLeo, VA ;
Fowler, JF ;
Fransway, AF ;
Maibach, HI ;
Mathias, CGT ;
Nethercott, JR ;
Rietschel, RL ;
Sherertz, EF ;
Storrs, FJ ;
Taylor, JS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 38 (06) :911-918
[7]   STATISTICAL AND COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 4600 PATIENTS TESTED IN BARCELONA (1973-1977) [J].
ROMAGUERA, C ;
GRIMALT, F .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1980, 6 (05) :309-315
[8]   The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens [J].
Saripalli, YV ;
Achen, F ;
Belsito, DV .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 49 (01) :65-69
[9]  
Thompson Trevor R, 2002, Am J Contact Dermat, V13, P177, DOI 10.1053/ajcd.2002.36643