Photobiomodulation on the angiogenesis of skin wounds in rats using different light sources

被引:172
作者
Corazza, Adalberto Vieira
Jorge, Jacks
Kurachi, Cristina
Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Dept Patol, Fac Dent Piracicaba, BR-13414903 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Inst Phys, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Engn Sch, Dept Bioengn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[4] Americana Sch, Sch Physiotherapy, Americana, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1089/pho.2006.2011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the angiogenic effects of laser and light-emitting diode ( LED) illumination on wounds induced in rats, with varied fluence. Background Data: The LED is an alternative light source that accelerates wound healing, and its efficiency concerning the angiogenic effect was compared to low-level laser therapy ( LLLT). Methods: The experimental model consisted of a circular wound inflicted on the quadriceps of 120 rats, using a 15-mm-diameter "punch." Animals were divided randomly into five groups: two groups of laser, with dosages of 5 and 20 J/cm(2), respectively, two groups of LED, also with dosages of 5 and 20 J/cm(2), and a control group. Six hours after wound infliction, the treated groups received the diverse applications accordingly and were irradiated every 24 h. Angiogenesis was studied through histomorphometry on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 after the wounds were inflicted. Results: On days 3, 7, and 14, the proliferation of blood vessels in all irradiated groups was superior in comparison to those of the control group ( p < 0.05). Treatment with fluence of 5 J/cm(2) was better than the laser group with 20 J/cm(2) on day 21. Conclusion: Red LLLT and LED demonstrated expressive results in angiogenesis. Light coherence was shown not to be essential to angiogenesis. However, further studies are needed in order to investigate the photobiomodulatory effects of LED in relation to LLLT in various biological tissues.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 106
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Low-power helium:neon laser irradiation enhances production of vascular endothelial growth factor and promotes growth of endothelial cells in vitro [J].
Kipshidze, N ;
Nikolaychik, V ;
Keelan, MH ;
Shankar, LR ;
Khanna, A ;
Kornowski, R ;
Leon, M ;
Moses, J .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (04) :355-364
[22]   Wound healing in cell studies and animal model experiments by low level laser therapy; Were clinical studies justified? A systematic review [J].
Lucas, C ;
Criens-Poublon, LJ ;
Cockrell, CT ;
de Haan, RJ .
LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 17 (02) :110-134
[23]   Influence of low level laser therapy on wound healing and its biological action upon myofibroblasts [J].
Medrado, ARAP ;
Pugliese, LS ;
Reis, SRA ;
Andrade, ZA .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2003, 32 (03) :239-244
[24]   A histologic assessment of the influence of low-intensity laser therapy on wound healing in steroid-treated animals [J].
Pessoa, ES ;
Melhado, RM ;
Theodoro, LH ;
Garcia, VG .
PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2004, 22 (03) :199-204
[25]  
Pontinen PJ, 1996, ACUPUNCTURE ELECTRO, V21, P105
[26]  
Pontinen PJ, 2000, LASERS MED DENT 1, P455
[27]   Comparison of the photostimulatory effects of visible He-Ne and infrared Ga-As lasers on healing impaired diabetic rat wounds [J].
Reddy, GK .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (05) :344-351
[28]   Laser photostimulation accelerates wound healing in diabetic rats [J].
Reddy, GK ;
Stehno-Bittel, L ;
Enwemeka, CS .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2001, 9 (03) :248-255
[29]   Increased dermal angiogenesis after low-intensity laser therapy for a chronic radiation ulcer determined by a video measuring system [J].
Schindl, A ;
Schindl, M ;
Schindl, L ;
Jurecka, W ;
Hönigsmann, H ;
Breier, F .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 40 (03) :481-484
[30]   Direct stimulatory effect of low-intensity 670 nm laser irradiation on human endothelial cell proliferation [J].
Schindl, A ;
Merwald, H ;
Schindl, L ;
Kaun, C ;
Wojta, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 148 (02) :334-336