The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin

被引:148
作者
Armstrong, SR [1 ]
Keller, JC
Boyer, DB
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Operat Dent, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dow Inst Dent Res, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
microtensile bond test; adhesion; dentin bonding agents; C-factor; storage;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00081-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the elastic wall concept utilizing adhesive resins of varying stiffness in a low- and high-C-factor cavity design after short- and long-term water storage. Methods: A flat and box-shaped cavity was restored on occlusal dentin with a resin composite using a filled and unfilled adhesive resin from which microtensile specimens with a 0.5 mm(2) cross-sectional area were formed. After storage for 30- and 150-days the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) was determined in a Zwick materials testing machine and the subsequent debond pathway was examined under scanning electron microscopy. Fisher's exact test was used to determine differences in joint and substrate failure modes and a Weibull regression model with gamma frailties was used to test for differences between failure distributions. Tests for three way and two-way interactions were also completed for storage time, C-factor and adhesive. All tests were at 95% confidence levels. Results: The characteristic strength (TBS degrees) for the Optabond FL adhesive applied on a flat cavity was 47.57 and 20.90 MPa and a box-shaped cavity was 49.26 and 17.49 MPa for short- and long-term storage, respectively, while the corresponding TBS degrees for the unfilled Optibond adhesive on the flat cavity design was 36.93 and 32.68 MPa and in a box-shaped cavity was 32.84 and 15.46 MPa. Combining all groups according to storage time revealed a three-fold increase in the debond pathway including the bottom of the hybrid layer. Significance: Evidence suggests that the durability of the bonded joint is threatened by hydrolysis and the most susceptible region is the bottom half of the hybrid layer and in low C-factor cavity designs a more flexible adhesive resin liner was more durable. (C) 2001 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 276
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Alani AH, 1997, OPER DENT, V22, P173
[2]   Tensile strength of thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness [J].
Alster, D ;
Feilzer, AJ ;
DeGee, AJ ;
Davidson, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (11) :1745-1748
[3]   Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives [J].
Armstrong, SR ;
Boyer, DB ;
Keller, JC .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (01) :44-50
[4]  
ASMUSSEN E, 1985, POSTERIOR COMPOSITE, P217
[5]  
BAUSCH JR, 1982, J PROSTHET DENT, V48, P59, DOI 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90048-8
[6]  
Burrow Michael F., 1993, Bulletin of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, V40, P173
[7]  
CARVALHO RM, 1995, AM J DENT, V8, P253
[8]  
Carvalho RM, 1996, OPER DENT, V21, P17
[9]   The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite [J].
Choi, KK ;
Condon, JR ;
Ferracane, JL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (03) :812-817
[10]   DENTINAL FLUID-DYNAMICS IN HUMAN TEETH, IN-VIVO [J].
CIUCCHI, B ;
BOUILLAGUET, S ;
HOLZ, J ;
PASHLEY, D .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1995, 21 (04) :191-194