Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography

被引:59
作者
Gerber, TC
Kuzo, RS
Morin, RL
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
angiography; calcium; computed tomography; coronary artery disease; imaging; radiation dose;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-004-5338-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
With increasing clinical use of cardiac CT imaging it is important that all health care providers referring for or administering such examinations are familiar with the concepts and values of radiation dosimetry in CT as well as with the basic principles of radiation protection. There are important technical differences pertinent to radiation dose between the CT scanner types that are currently being used for imaging of the heart and coronary arteries. As a result of these differences, the radiation dose typically is higher when a cardiac examination is performed with multidetector-row CT (MDCT) than when it is performed with electron beam CT. Several techniques have been described to reduce radiation dose of MDCT imaging by varying the X-ray tube current during a CT examination. The volume computed tomographic dose index (CTDIvol), the dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (E) are the most useful parameters to describe and compare radiation doses received from cardiac CT examinations. When comparing radiation doses between scanning protocols and scanner types, the degree of image noise must be considered. Diagnostic, rather than aesthetic, quality of images should be the most important factor guiding the development of scanning protocols for cardiac CT imaging. Cardiac CT examinations should be ordered only by qualified health care providers, and the ordering clinicians should be aware of their responsibility of weighing risks of the radiation exposure against the expected benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 176
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography EUR 16262 EN
[2]   Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays:: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries [J].
Berrington de González, A ;
Darby, S .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9406) :345-351
[3]   CARDIAC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BOYD, DP ;
LIPTON, MJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1983, 71 (03) :298-307
[4]  
CAMERON J. R., 1964, HLTH PHYS, V10, P25, DOI 10.1097/00004032-196401000-00003
[5]   Imaging of congenital coronary anomalies with multislice computed tomography [J].
Deibler, AR ;
Kuzo, RS ;
Vohringer, M ;
Page, EE ;
Safford, RE ;
Patton, JN ;
Lane, GE ;
Morin, RL ;
Gerber, TC .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 79 (08) :1017-1023
[6]  
*GE HEALTHC, COMP TOM ESP
[7]  
Gerber T C, 2005, Heart, V91, P130, DOI 10.1136/hrt.2004.038281
[8]   Current results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart [J].
Gerber, TC ;
Kuzo, RS ;
Karstaedt, N ;
Lane, GE ;
Morin, RL ;
Sheedy, PF ;
Safford, RE ;
Blackshear, JL ;
Pietan, JH .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 77 (01) :55-71
[9]  
GERBER TC, IN PRESS INVEST RADI
[10]   Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. 1. Simulation studies [J].
Gies, M ;
Kalender, WA ;
Wolf, H ;
Suess, C ;
Madsen, MT .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) :2235-2247