Similarity effects in online training: Effects with computerized trainer agents

被引:38
作者
Behrend, Tara S. [1 ]
Thompson, Lori Foster [2 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Org Sci & Commun, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Psychol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Intelligent agents; Similarity-attraction; E-learning; Web-based training; Social categorization; Diversity; DEEP-LEVEL DIVERSITY; NOMOLOGICAL NETWORK; SURFACE-LEVEL; PERSONALITY; ATTRACTION; PERFORMANCE; WORKGROUPS; ETHNICITY; RESPONSES; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.016
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this study, trainees worked with computerized trainer agents that were either similar to them or different regarding appearance or feedback-giving style. Similarity was assessed objectively, based on appearance and feedback style matching, and subjectively, based on participants' self-reported perceptions of similarity. Appearance similarity had few effects. Objective feedback similarity led to higher scores on a declarative knowledge test and higher liking for the trainer. Subjective feedback similarity was related to reactions, engagement, and liking for the trainer. Overall, results indicated that subjective similarity is more important in predicting training outcomes than objective similarity, and that surface-level similarity is less important than deep-level similarity. These results shed new light on the dynamics between e-learners and trainer agents, and inform the design of agent-based training. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1206
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Social desirability and Mexican American counselor preferences: Statistical control for a potential confound [J].
Abreu, JM ;
Gabarain, G .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 47 (02) :165-176
[2]   TRANSFER OF TRAINING - A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE-RESEARCH [J].
BALDWIN, TT ;
FORD, JK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 41 (01) :63-105
[3]  
Baylor A. L., 2005, INT J ARTIF INTELL E, V15, P95
[4]  
Baylor A.L., 2005, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, V15, P95, DOI [10.1007/s40593-015-0055-y, DOI 10.1007/S40593-015-0055-Y, DOI 10.1007/BF02504991]
[5]  
BEHREND TS, 2010, USING ANIMATED UNPUB
[6]   IN-GROUP BIAS IN THE MINIMAL INTERGROUP SITUATION - COGNITIVE-MOTIVATIONAL ANALYSIS [J].
BREWER, MB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (02) :307-324
[7]   An examination of the structure and nomological network of trainee reactions: A closer look at "smile sheets" [J].
Brown, KG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (05) :991-1001
[8]   ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS [J].
BYRNE, D ;
NELSON, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 1 (06) :659-663
[9]   Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers [J].
Chou, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 34 (03) :265-279
[10]  
Deci E.L., 2008, INTRINSIC MOTIVATION