Patent collaboration and international knowledge flow

被引:56
作者
Guan, Jiancheng [1 ]
Chen, Zifeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Management Engn, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Collaboration; Patent; Knowledge flow; Social networks; NETWORK STRUCTURE; INNOVATION; CENTRALITY; DIFFUSION; PATTERNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2011.03.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we provide an empirical analysis of evolving knowledge networks of successful patent collaboration at national level in 1980s, 1990s, and 20005. All countries are classified into main knowledge creators (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) group) and main knowledge users (non-OECD group) in order to distinguish specific characteristics of knowledge interactions within groups and between groups. The analyses are carried out from four aspects, i.e., the overall distribution of knowledge interactions among countries, the countries' ability to inhabit and facilitate the knowledge flows among others with the help of flow betweenness measures, the countries' bridgeness between two groups with the recently developed Q-measures, and the most important bilateral knowledge interactions. Results show that although most of the international knowledge interactions still take place within the OECD group, the non-OECD countries have improved their performance significantly. They participate much more in international patenting and collaborations and play much more important roles in facilitating knowledge interactions among others. Among them, China and Taiwan are two most dazzling new stars according to their performance in international knowledge interactions. Considering together with their rapidly improved world competitiveness, the findings indicate that the wide and deep participation in international knowledge interactions may have great contribution to the economic competitiveness. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 181
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
Flom P.L., 2004, Connections, V26, P62
[12]   CENTRALITY IN VALUED GRAPHS - A MEASURE OF BETWEENNESS BASED ON NETWORK FLOW [J].
FREEMAN, LC ;
BORGATTI, SP ;
WHITE, DR .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1991, 13 (02) :141-154
[13]   THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR CENTRALITY MEASURES [J].
FRIEDKIN, NE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1991, 96 (06) :1478-1504
[14]   There's a new man in town: the paradigm shift in optical technology [J].
Frietsch, R ;
Grupp, H .
TECHNOVATION, 2006, 26 (01) :13-29
[15]   'The tyranny of distance': Biotechnology networks and clusters in the antipodes [J].
Gilding, Michael .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (6-7) :1132-1144
[16]   Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms [J].
Guan, Jian Cheng ;
Mok, Chiu Kam ;
Yam, Richard C. M. ;
Chin, K. S. ;
Pun, Kit Fai .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2006, 73 (06) :666-678
[17]   The technological system of Chinese manufacturing industry: A sectorial approach [J].
Guan, Jiancheng ;
Chen, Zifeng .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 20 (04) :767-776
[18]   Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding [J].
Hertzum, Morten .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 44 (02) :957-962
[19]   Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan [J].
Hu, AGZ ;
Jaffe, AB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2003, 21 (06) :849-880
[20]   Knowledge capital and spillover on regional economic growth: Evidence from China [J].
Kuo, Chun-Chien ;
Yang, Chih-Hai .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 19 (04) :594-604