A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation - Results of the Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT)

被引:167
作者
Carlson, MD
Ip, J
Messenger, J
Beau, S
Kalbfleisch, S
Gervais, P
Cameron, DA
Duran, A
Val-Mejias, J
Mackall, J
Gold, M
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Thorac Cardiovasc Inst, Lansing, MI USA
[4] Long Beach Mem Med Ctr, Long Beach, CA USA
[5] Arkansas Heart Hosp, Little Rock, AR USA
[6] Mid Ohio Cardiol, Columbus, OH USA
[7] Hosp St Joseph, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[8] Toronto Gen Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Orlando Heart Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[10] St Francis ICT, Wichita, KS USA
[11] Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, SC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00780-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT) was a single blind, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the atrial fibrillation (AF) Suppression Algorithm (St. Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division, Sylmar, California) in patients with sick sinus syndrome and AF. BACKGROUND This algorithm increases the pacing rate when the native rhythm emerges and periodically reduces the rate to search for intrinsic atrial activity. METHODS Symptomatic AF burden (percentage of days during which symptomatic AF occurred) was the primary end point. Patients underwent pacemaker implantation, were randomized to DDDR with the algorithm on (treatment) or off (control), and were followed for six months. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and antiarrhythmic drugs used were similar in both groups. The percentage of atrial pacing was higher in the treatment group (92.9% vs. 67.9%, p < 0.0001). The AF Suppression Algorithm reduced symptomatic AF burden by 25% (2.50% control vs. 1.87% treatment). Atrial fibrillation burden decreased progressively in both groups but was lower in the treatment group at each follow-up visit (one, three, and six months) (p = 0.005). Quality of life scores improved in both groups. The mean number of AF episodes (4.3 +/- 11.5 control vs. 3.2 +/- 8.6 treatment); total hospitalizations (17 control vs. 15 treatment); and incidence of complications, adverse events, and deaths were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS The ADOPT demonstrated that overdrive atrial pacing with the AF Suppression Algorithm decreased symptomatic AF burden significantly in patients with sick sinus syndrome and AF. The decrease in relative AF burden was substantial (25%), although the absolute difference was small (2.50% control vs. 1.87% treatment). (C) 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 633
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] Does atrial overdrive pacing prevent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in paced patients?
    Levy, T
    Walker, S
    Rex, S
    Paul, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 75 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [12] A NEW PACING ALGORITHM FOR OVERDRIVE SUPPRESSION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
    MURGATROYD, FD
    NITZSCHE, R
    SLADE, AKB
    LIMOUSIN, M
    ROSSET, N
    CAMM, AJ
    RITTER, P
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (11): : 1966 - 1973
  • [13] Permanent overdrive atrial pacing in the chronic management of recurrent postoperative atrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with complex congenital heart disease
    Ragonese, P
    Drago, F
    Guccione, P
    Santilli, A
    Silvetti, MS
    Agostino, DA
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (12): : 2917 - 2923
  • [14] Impact of consistent atrial pacing algorithm on premature atrial complexe number and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrences in brady-tachy syndrome: A randomized prospective cross over study
    Ricci, R
    Santini, M
    Puglisi, A
    Azzolini, P
    Capucci, A
    Pignalberi, C
    Boriani, G
    Botto, GL
    Spampinato, A
    Bellocci, F
    Proclemer, A
    Grammatico, A
    de Seta, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [15] Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation
    Roy, D
    Talajic, M
    Dorian, P
    Connolly, S
    Eisenberg, MJ
    Green, M
    Kus, T
    Lambert, J
    Dubuc, M
    Gagné, P
    Nattel, S
    Thibault, B
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (13) : 913 - 920
  • [16] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH SICK SINUS SYNDROME - A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL ASPECTS AMONG UNPACED, VENTRICULAR INHIBITED PACED, AND PHYSIOLOGICALLY PACED GROUPS
    SASAKI, Y
    SHIMOTORI, M
    AKAHANE, K
    YONEKURA, H
    HIRANO, K
    ENDOH, R
    KOIKE, S
    KAWA, S
    FURUTA, S
    HOMMA, T
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 11 (11): : 1575 - 1583
  • [17] Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after pacing: The Canadian Trial Of Physiologic Pacing
    Skanes, AC
    Krahn, AD
    Yee, R
    Klein, GJ
    Connolly, SJ
    Kerr, CR
    Gent, M
    Thorpe, KE
    Roberts, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [18] Determinants of efficacy of atrial pacing in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrences
    Stabile, G
    Senatore, G
    De Simone, A
    Turco, P
    Coltorti, F
    Nocerino, P
    Vitale, DF
    Chiariello, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [19] DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ATRIAL SINGLE CHAMBER PACING (AAI) AND VENTRICULAR SINGLE CHAMBER PACING (VVI) WITH RESPECT TO PROGNOSIS AND ANTIARRHYTHMIC EFFECT IN PATIENTS WITH SICK SINUS SYNDROME
    STANGL, K
    SEITZ, K
    WIRTZFELD, A
    ALT, E
    BLOMER, H
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 13 (12): : 2080 - 2085
  • [20] Atrial arrhythmia suppression by atrial overdrive pacing: pacemaker Holter assessment
    Ward, KJ
    Willett, JE
    Bucknall, C
    Gill, JS
    Kamalvand, K
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2001, 3 (02): : 108 - 114