Review of insecticide resistance in cat fleas (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae)

被引:49
作者
Bossard, RL [1 ]
Hinkle, NC [1 ]
Rust, MK [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Entomol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
Ctenocephalides felis; insecticide susceptibility; bioassays; systemics; sustained release; flea collars;
D O I
10.1093/jmedent/35.4.415
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Insecticide resistance often is blamed for failures of insecticides to control cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouche). Yet the genetics and adaptive advantage of resistance traits remain unexamined. Lethal doses of insecticides that kill 50% of the population fluctuate 7-fold within a cat nea strain. Many reports of flea resistance may be attributable to variable mortality from effects of solvents, substrates, humidities, temperatures, colonization, and ages of fleas. Resistance ratios (ratios of lethal doses of a resistant to a susceptible strain) are <690-fold in fleas; lower than many other arthropods. This, plus strain variability, hinders resistance detection. Relationships between resistance levels, control failures, and health threats are unclear. Insensitive acetylcholinesterase, knock-down recovery, glutathione transferase conjugation, and mixed function oxidase/cytochrome P450 are demonstrated resistance mechanisms in cat fleas. Ecological genetics of resistance in cat fleas probably involves flea transfer among hosts, host movements, refugia, founder effects, and mortality from abiotic factors. Understanding cat nea resistance requires population monitoring before, during, and after insecticide treatments using conventional and rapid molecular bioassays. Sustained insecticide release devices such as nea collars and long-lived insecticide residues for premises possibly contribute to the development of resistance. New systemic and topical insecticides, especially when given prophylactically, may act similarly. Eliminating insecticides prevents insecticide resistance but necessitates application of biorational tactics incorporating mechanical, environmental, and cultural controls. Using high temperatures, low humidities, host grooming and such tactics as decreasing doses, increasing action thresholds, rotating insecticides, and leaving spatial and temporal refugia may suppress cat nea resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 422
页数:8
相关论文
共 82 条
[71]  
SHEPPARD DC, 1992, J ECON ENTOMOL, V85, P1587, DOI 10.1093/jee/85.5.1587
[72]  
SILVER GM, 1997, P 4 INT S ECT PETS 6, P91
[73]   INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY ON SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAT FLEA, CTENOCEPHALIDES-FELIS (SIPHONAPTERA, PULICIDAE) [J].
SILVERMAN, J ;
RUST, MK ;
REIERSON, DA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1981, 18 (01) :78-83
[74]   SOME ABIOTIC FACTORS AFFECTING THE SURVIVAL OF THE CAT FLEA, CTENOCEPHALIDES-FELIS (SIPHONAPTERA, PULICIDAE) [J].
SILVERMAN, J ;
RUST, MK .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1983, 12 (02) :490-495
[75]   RESISTANCE TO TOXINS FROM BACILLUS-THURINGIENSIS SUBSP KURSTAKI CAUSES MINIMAL CROSS-RESISTANCE TO BACILLUS-THURINGIENSIS SUBSP AIZAWAI IN THE DIAMONDBACK MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA, PLUTELLIDAE) [J].
TABASHNIK, BE ;
FINSON, N ;
JOHNSON, MW ;
MOAR, WJ .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 59 (05) :1332-1335
[76]   On-host viability and fecundity of Ctenocephalides felis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae), using a novel chambered flea technique [J].
Thomas, RE ;
Wallenfels, L ;
Popiel, I .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1996, 33 (02) :250-256
[77]  
Vater V. G., 1985, ANGEW PARASITOL, V26, P27
[78]   SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTION OF ARTIFICIALLY FED CAT FLEAS, CTENOCEPHALIDES-FELIS BOUCHE (SIPHONAPTERA, PULICIDAE) [J].
WADE, SE ;
GEORGI, JR .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1988, 25 (03) :186-190
[80]   Resistance to the insecticides lufenuron and propoxur in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) [J].
Wilson, TG ;
Cain, JW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1997, 90 (05) :1131-1136