Efficacy of paroxetine in treating major depressive disorder in persons with multiple sclerosis

被引:65
作者
Ehde, Dawn M. [1 ]
Kraft, George H. [1 ,2 ]
Chwastiak, Lydia [3 ]
Sullivan, Mark D. [4 ]
Gibbons, Laura E. [5 ]
Bombardier, Charles H. [1 ]
Wadhwani, Rohini [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Dept Psychosocial & Community Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
multiple sclerosis; depression; major depressive disorder; clinical trial; paroxetine; disability; treatment;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.08.002
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paroxetine in treating major depressive disorder (MDD) in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Method: In this double-blind trial, 42 participants with MS and MDD were randomly assigned to one of two parallel 12-week treatment arms: paroxetine or placebo. The participants started at an initial dose of 10 mg/day paroxetine or placebo, titrated up to 40 mg daily based on symptoms response and side effects. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Secondary outcomes included fatigue, anxiety and self-reported quality of life. Results: Intent-to-treat analyses revealed that both groups improved from pretreatment to posttreatment. Although the treatment group improved more than the control group on most measures, few differences were statistically significant. For the primary outcome, 57.1% of participants in the treatment arm had at least a 50% reduction in HAM-D score, compared with 40% in the control group (nonsignificant). Treatment effects were greater among the participants who completed the study; 78.6% of completers had a treatment response compared with 42.1% of controls (P=.073). Conclusion: Although paroxetine may not be efficacious for all persons with MS and MDD, it appears to benefit some individuals. 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 48
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5, V5th ed.
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Am J Psychiatry, V157, P1
[3]   Depression in multiple sclerosis: Relationship to working memory capacity [J].
Arnett, PA ;
Higginson, CI ;
Voss, WD ;
Bender, WI ;
Wurst, JM ;
Tippin, JM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) :546-556
[4]   Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: A consensus approach [J].
Benedict, RHB ;
Fischer, JS ;
Archibald, CJ ;
Arnett, PA ;
Beatty, WW ;
Bobholz, J ;
Chelune, GJ ;
Fisk, JD ;
Langdon, DW ;
Caruso, L ;
Foley, F ;
LaRocca, NG ;
Vowels, L ;
Weinstein, A ;
DeLuca, J ;
Rao, SM ;
Munschauer, F .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 16 (03) :381-397
[5]   Self-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale with functional system scores correlates well with a physician-administered test [J].
Bowen, J ;
Gibbons, L ;
Gianas, A ;
Kraft, GH .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2001, 7 (03) :201-206
[6]   Antidepressant use in multiple sclerosis: epidemiologic study of a large community sample [J].
Cetin, K. ;
Johnson, K. L. ;
Ehde, D. M. ;
Kuehn, C. M. ;
Amtmann, D. ;
Kraft, G. H. .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2007, 13 (08) :1046-1053
[7]   Depressive symptoms and severity of illness in multiple sclerosis: Epidemiologic study of a large community sample [J].
Chwastiak, L ;
Ehde, DM ;
Gibbons, LE ;
Sullivan, M ;
Bowen, JD ;
Kraft, GH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 159 (11) :1862-1868
[8]   SLEEP DISTURBANCE, DEPRESSION, AND LESION SITE IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
CLARK, CM ;
FLEMING, JA ;
LI, D ;
OGER, J ;
KLONOFF, H ;
PATY, D .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1992, 49 (06) :641-643
[9]  
Derogatis L R, 1974, Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry, V7, P79
[10]   THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE [J].
DIENER, E ;
EMMONS, RA ;
LARSEN, RJ ;
GRIFFIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (01) :71-75