Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis

被引:82
作者
Moberg, AC [1 ]
Berndsen, F [1 ]
Palmquist, I [1 ]
Petersson, U [1 ]
Resch, T [1 ]
Montgomery, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4842
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopy is safe for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. This study compared recovery after laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) for confirmed appendicitis, carried out by experienced surgeons in an educational setting. Methods: One hundred and sixty-three patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis suitable for LA were randomized prospectively to either LA or OA in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was time to full recovery. Secondary endpoints were operating time, complications, hospital stay and functional status. Results: There was no significant difference between LA and OA in time to full recovery (9 and 11 days respectively; P = 0.225). Operating time was 55 min in the LA group and 60 min in the OA group (P = 0.416). The complication rate was 8.6 and 11.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.696), and median hospital stay was 2 days in both groups (P = 0.192). Functional status was significantly better in the LA group 7-10 days after operation (P = 0.045). Conclusion: There was no difference in time to full recovery after LA and OA in patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis. A trend towards better physical activity was noted after the laparoscopic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Altman DG., 2013, STAT CONFIDENCE CONF
[2]  
Berndsen F, 2002, Hernia, V6, P56
[3]  
Chiarugi M, 2001, ACTA CHIR BELG, V101, P243
[4]   A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy [J].
Chung, RS ;
Rowland, DY ;
Li, P ;
Diaz, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :250-256
[5]   A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY [J].
FRAZEE, RC ;
ROBERTS, JW ;
SYMMONDS, RE ;
SNYDER, SK ;
HENDRICKS, JC ;
SMITH, RW ;
CUSTER, MD ;
HARRISON, JB .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (06) :725-731
[6]   Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy [J].
Garbutt, JM ;
Soper, NJ ;
Shannon, WD ;
Botero, A ;
Littenberg, B .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) :17-26
[7]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis [J].
Golub, R ;
Siddiqui, F ;
Pohl, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (05) :545-553
[8]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial [J].
Hansen, JB ;
Smithers, BM ;
Schache, D ;
Wall, DR ;
Miller, BJ ;
Menzies, BL .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (01) :17-21
[9]   Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy [J].
Hellberg, A ;
Rudberg, C ;
Kullman, E ;
Enochsson, L ;
Fenyö, G ;
Graffner, H ;
Hallerbäck, B ;
Johansson, B ;
Anderberg, B ;
Wenner, J ;
Ringqvist, I ;
Sörensen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) :48-53
[10]  
Hellberg A, 2001, EUR J SURG, V167, P209