Affinity and specificity of protein U1A-RNA complex formation based on an additive component free energy model

被引:38
作者
Kormos, Bethany L. [1 ]
Benitex, Yulia
Baranger, Anne M.
Beveridge, David L.
机构
[1] Wesleyan Univ, Dept Chem, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
[2] Wesleyan Univ, Mol Biophys Program, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Chem, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
MM-PB(GB)SA; U1A; protein-RNA recognition; molecular dynamics; binding free energy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An MM-GBSA computational protocol was used to investigate wild-type U1A-RNA and F56 U1A mutant experimental binding free energies. The trend in mutant binding free energies compared to wild-type is well-reproduced. Following application of a linear-response-like equation to scale the various energy components, the binding free energies agree quantitatively with observed experimental values. Conformational adaptain these systems. Small differences in Delta Gs are the result of different and sometimes quite large relative contributions from various energetic components. Residual free energy decomposition indicates differences not only at the site of mutation, but throughout the entire protein. MM-GBSA and ab initio calculations performed on model systems suggest that stacking interactions may nearly, but not completely, account for observed differences in mutant binding affinities. This study indicates that there may be different underlying causes of ostensibly similar experimentally observed binding affinities of different mutants, and thus recommends caution in the interpretation of binding affinities and specificities purely by inspection. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1405 / 1419
页数:15
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Computational methods to predict binding free energy in ligand-receptor complexes [J].
Ajay ;
Murcko, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 38 (26) :4953-4967
[2]   Site-directed mutagenesis reveals the thermodynamic requirements for single-stranded DNA recognition by the telomere-binding protein Cdc13 [J].
Anderson, EM ;
Halsey, WA ;
Wuttke, DS .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2003, 42 (13) :3751-3758
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems: Theoretical and Experimental Applications
[4]   NEW METHOD FOR PREDICTING BINDING-AFFINITY IN COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN [J].
AQVIST, J ;
MEDINA, C ;
SAMUELSSON, JE .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (03) :385-391
[5]   Solution structure of the N-terminal RNP domain of U1A protein: The role of C-terminal residues in structure stability and RNA binding [J].
Avis, JM ;
Allain, FHT ;
Howe, PWA ;
Varani, G ;
Nagai, K ;
Neuhaus, D .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 257 (02) :398-411
[6]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[7]   Molecular dynamics and thermodynamics of protein-RNA interactions: Mutation of a conserved aromatic residue modifies stacking interactions and structural adaptation in the U1A-stem loop 2 RNA complex [J].
Blakaj, DM ;
McConnell, KJ ;
Beveridge, DL ;
Baranger, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 123 (11) :2548-2551
[8]   THE HUMAN U1 SNRNP-SPECIFIC U1A PROTEIN INHIBITS POLYADENYLATION OF ITS OWN PREMESSENGER RNA [J].
BOELENS, WC ;
JANSEN, EJR ;
VANVENROOIJ, WJ ;
STRIPECKE, R ;
MATTAJ, IW ;
GUNDERSON, SI .
CELL, 1993, 72 (06) :881-892
[9]   CALCULATION OF SMALL MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BY DIFFERENCES OF SEPARATE TOTAL ENERGIES - SOME PROCEDURES WITH REDUCED ERRORS [J].
BOYS, SF ;
BERNARDI, F .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1970, 19 (04) :553-&
[10]   Minimalist protein design:: A β-hairpin peptide that binds ssDNA [J].
Butterfield, SM ;
Cooper, WJ ;
Waters, ML .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 127 (01) :24-25