Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tunnel Position and Graft Obliquity With Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Femoral Tunnel Reaming Techniques Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:88
作者
Bowers, Andrea L.
Bedi, Asheesh [1 ]
Lipman, Joseph D.
Potter, Hollis G.
Rodeo, Scott A.
Pearle, Andrew D.
Warren, Russell F.
Altchek, David W.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TIBIAL TUNNEL; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE STABILITY; CORONAL PLANE; PLACEMENT; LANDMARKS; CADAVER; KINEMATICS; FLEXION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Purpose: Using 3-dimensional high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we sought to compare femoral and tibial tunnel position and resultant graft obliquity with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using transtibial (TT) or anteromedial (AM) portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques. Methods: Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled after primary, autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction by 2 groups of high-volume, fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons. With the TT technique, an external starting point was used to maximize graft obliquity and femoral footprint capture. By use of high-resolution MRI and imaging analysis software, bilateral 3-dimensional knee models were created, mirrored, and superimposed. Differences between centroids for each femoral and tibial insertion, as well as corresponding ACL/graft obliquity, were evaluated with paired t tests and 2-sided Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests, with P < .05 defined as significant. Results: No significant differences were observed between groups in position of reconstructed femoral footprints. However, on the tibial side, AM centroids averaged 0.8 +/- 1.9 mm anterior to native ACL centroids, whereas the TT group centered 5.23 +/- 2.4 mm posterior to native ACL centroids (P < .001). Sagittal obliquity was closely restored with the AM technique (mean, 52.2 degrees v 53.5 degrees for native ACL) but was significantly more vertical (mean, 66.9(degrees)) (P = .0001) for the TT group. Conclusions: In this clinical series, AM portal femoral tunnel reaming more accurately restored native ACL anatomy than the TT technique. Although both techniques can capture the native femoral footprint with similar accuracy, the TT technique requires significantly greater posterior placement of the tibial tunnel, resulting in decreased sagittal graft obliquity. When a tibial tunnel is drilled without the need to accommodate subsequent femoral tunnel reaming, more accurate tibial tunnel position and resultant sagittal graft obliquity are achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1522
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction An In Vivo Imaging Analysis Comparing Transtibial and 2-Incision Tibial Tunnel-Independent Techniques [J].
Abebe, Ermias S. ;
Moorman, C. T., III ;
Dziedzic, T. Scott ;
Spritzer, Charles E. ;
Cothran, R. Lee ;
Taylor, Dean C. ;
Garrett, William E., Jr. ;
DeFrate, Louis E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (10) :1904-1911
[2]
Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study [J].
Ahn, Jin Hwan ;
Lee, Sang Hak ;
Yoo, Jae Chul ;
Ha, Hae Chan .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (11) :1293-1300
[3]
The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Alentorn-Geli, Eduard ;
Lajara, Francisco ;
Samitier, Gonzalo ;
Cugat, Ramon .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2010, 18 (08) :1013-1037
[4]
Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study [J].
Arnold, MP ;
Kooloos, J ;
van Kampen, A .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 9 (04) :194-199
[5]
In vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching technique [J].
Asano, T ;
Akagi, M ;
Tanaka, K ;
Tamura, J ;
Nakamura, T .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2001, (388) :157-166
[6]
Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Reaming in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Surgical Technique [J].
Bedi, Asheesh ;
Musahl, Volker ;
Steuber, Volker ;
Kendoff, Daniel ;
Choi, Dan ;
Allen, Answorth A. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. ;
Altchek, David W. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (03) :380-390
[7]
The "Footprint" Anterior Cruciate Ligament Technique: An Anatomic Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction [J].
Bedi, Asheesh ;
Altchek, David W. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (10) :1128-1138
[9]
Changes in the Length of Virtual Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibers During Stability Testing A Comparison of Conventional Single-Bundle Reconstruction and Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament [J].
Brophy, Robert H. ;
Voos, James E. ;
Shannon, Fintan J. ;
Granchi, Carinne C. ;
Wickiewicz, Thomas L. ;
Warren, Russell F. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (11) :2196-2203
[10]
Anatomic endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patella tendon autograft [J].
Cain, EL ;
Clancy, WG .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 33 (04) :717-+