How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations

被引:103
作者
Garant, D
Kruuk, LEB
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Edward Grey Inst, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Biol Sci, Inst Evolutionary Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
animal model; genetic correlation; heritability; pedigree reconstruction; quantitative genetics; selection;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02561.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Estimating the genetic basis of phenotypic traits and the selection pressures acting on them are central to our understanding of the evolution and conservation of wild populations. However, obtaining such evolutionary-related parameters is not an easy task as it requires accurate information on both relatedness among individuals and their breeding success. Polymorphic molecular markers are very useful in estimating relatedness between individuals and parentage analyses are now extensively used in most taxa. The next step in the application of molecular data to wild populations is to use them to derive estimates of evolutionary-related parameters for quantitative traits, such as quantitative genetic parameters (e.g. heritability, genetic correlations) and measures of selection (e.g. selection gradients). Despite their great appeal and potential, the optimal use of molecular tools is still debated and it remains unclear how they should best be used to obtain reliable estimates of evolutionary parameters in the wild. Here, we review the methods available for estimating quantitative genetic and selection parameters and discuss their merits and shortcomings, to provide a tool that summarizes the potential uses of molecular data to obtain such parameters in wild populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1843 / 1859
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   USING PATERNITY ANALYSIS TO MEASURE EFFECTIVE POLLEN DISPERSAL IN PLANT-POPULATIONS [J].
ADAMS, WT ;
GRIFFIN, AR ;
MORAN, GF .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 140 (05) :762-780
[2]   Estimation of single-generation sibling relationships based on DNA markers [J].
Almudevar, A ;
Field, C .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 1999, 4 (02) :136-165
[3]  
ARNOLD SJ, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P709, DOI [10.2307/2408383, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00344.x]
[4]   Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: Lessons for ecology and evolution [J].
Avise, JC ;
Jones, AG ;
Walker, D ;
DeWoody, JA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 2002, 36 :19-45
[5]   IDENTIX, a software to test for relatedness in a population using permutation methods [J].
Belkhir, K ;
Castric, V ;
Bonhomme, F .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2002, 2 (04) :611-614
[6]   DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations [J].
Blouin, MS .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (10) :503-511
[7]  
Blouin MS, 1996, MOL ECOL, V5, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00329.x
[8]   Accuracy, efficiency and robustness of four algorithms allowing full sibship reconstruction from DNA marker data [J].
Butler, K ;
Field, C ;
Herbinger, CM ;
Smith, BR .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (06) :1589-1600
[9]  
Coltman DW, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P2116, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01326.x
[10]   Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting [J].
Coltman, DW ;
O'Donoghue, P ;
Jorgenson, JT ;
Hogg, JT ;
Strobeck, C ;
Festa-Bianchet, M .
NATURE, 2003, 426 (6967) :655-658