Prevention of prostate cancer with finasteride: US/European perspective

被引:59
作者
Thompson, IM
Klein, EA
Lippman, SM
Coltman, CA
Djavan, B
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] SW Oncol Grp, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria
关键词
prostate cancer; finasteride; prevention;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2003.11.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer, affecting one man in six. Prevention of this disease, even in a subset of patients would have a significant impact on public health. The results of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial demonstrate that finasteride causes a substantial risk reduction across all known risk groups. We herein amplify on the results of this trial to assist patients and physicians in reaching individualized decisions. Materials and Methods: The results of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial were reviewed. Results: The PCPT demonstrated a 24.8% reduction in prostate cancer risk with the administration of finasteride. High-grade cancers were noted in 6.4% of finasteride patients compared to 5.1% of men receiving placebo. The increase in high-grade tumors was seen within one year of finasteride exposure and did not increase over time. This observation, combined with previous evidence demonstrating an alteration in cytologic and architectural features of prostate cancer with hormonal therapy suggests that the differences in high-grade disease may be an artifact and that application of Gleason grading to these tumors may not be appropriate. Discussion: Men should be presented the benefits and risks of taking finasteride and be assisted in integrating their sexual and urinary symptoms into their decision-making process. Blanket statements for or against the use of this medication ignore patient preferences and differential risk-benefit profiles from finasteride. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 655
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Age and PSA predict likelihood of organ-confined disease in men presenting with PSA less than 10 ng/ml: Implications for screening [J].
Aleman, M ;
Karakiewicz, PI ;
Kupelian, P ;
Kattan, MW ;
Graefen, M ;
Cagiannos, I ;
Eastham, J ;
Scardino, PT ;
Huland, H ;
Klein, EA .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (01) :70-74
[2]  
Algaba F, 1996, CANCER, V78, P376, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<376::AID-CNCR32>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-R
[4]  
Civantos F, 1996, Semin Urol Oncol, V14, P22
[5]   Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Djavan, B ;
Kadesky, K ;
Klopukh, B ;
Marberger, M ;
Roehrborn, CG .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1998, 33 (03) :261-270
[6]  
Djavan B, 2001, PROSTATE, V47, P111
[7]   Finasteride in the treatment of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review of randomised trials [J].
Edwards J.E. ;
Moore R.A. .
BMC Urology, 2 (1) :1-17
[8]   IMPOTENCE AND ITS MEDICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CORRELATES - RESULTS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS MALE AGING STUDY [J].
FELDMAN, HA ;
GOLDSTEIN, I ;
HATZICHRISTOU, DG ;
KRANE, RJ ;
MCKINLAY, JB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01) :54-61
[9]   Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients [J].
Hull, GW ;
Rabbani, F ;
Abbas, F ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Kattan, MW ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) :528-534
[10]  
Krumholtz JS, 2002, UROLOGY, V60, P469, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01875-7