Donor lymphocyte apheresis for adoptive immunotherapy compared with blood stem cell apheresis

被引:9
作者
Körbling, M
Giralt, S
Khouri, I
Mirza, N
Donato, M
Anderlini, P
Fischer, H
Andreeff, M
McMannis, J
Champlin, R
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Blood & Marrow Transplantat, Div Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Lab Med, Dept Transfus Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
blood stem cell apheresis; lymphocyte apheresis; donor lymphocyte infusion; G-CSF (filgrastim); CD34 positive cells; CD3 positive cells; graft vs. leukemia effect;
D O I
10.1002/jca.1017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Donor lymphocyte transfusion has gained considerable interest as adoptive cellular immunotherapy for treatment of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This study was designed to compare the yield of CD3(+), CD3(+)4(+), CD3(+)8(+), CD19(+), CD3(-)56(+)16(+), and CD34(+) cells contained in apheresis products from 61 consecutive non-cytokine treated, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors for lymphocyte collection with the corresponding apheresis-derived cell yield from 112 consecutive, HLA-matched donors for blood stem cell collection who received recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF, filgrastim) 6 mug/kg every 12 hours until cell collection was completed. Apheresis was started on day 4 or 5 of rhG-CSF treatment. The yield of lymphoid subsets was significantly different in the two sample groups, rhG-CSF treated product yields exceeding untreated product yields by a median of 2.1-fold (range: 1.3-2.6). However, the CD34(+) cell yield in rhG-CSF-treated apheresis products exceeded untreated products by 26-fold. A single untreated apheresis procedure was usually sufficient to collect a target dose of 1 x 10(8)/kg CD3(+) cells. Untreated apheresis products contained a median of 0.2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. A potential engraftment dose of greater than or equal to0.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kg of recipient body weight was contained in 16% of 57 untreated apheresis products. One single apheresis performed in a normal, untreated donor provides a sufficient amount of CD3(+) cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Compared with that of an rhG-CSF stimulated apheresis product, the CD34(+) cell count is usually, but not always, below the engraftment dose range, RhG-CSF treatment has tittle effect on the yield of lymphoid subsets collected by apheresis but is highly selective of the release of CD34(+) cells. This report provides baseline data for studies that will show whether other cytokines such as granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and/or Flt-3 Ligand can immunomodulate allotransfusates in vivo to improve the graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) effect after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, while lowering the incidence and severity of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). J. Clin. Apheresis, 16:82-87, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 87
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   INFUSIONS OF DONOR LEUKOCYTES TO TREAT EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS-ASSOCIATED LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS AFTER ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION [J].
PAPADOPOULOS, EB ;
LADANYI, M ;
EMANUEL, D ;
MACKINNON, S ;
BOULAD, F ;
CARABASI, MH ;
CASTROMALASPINA, H ;
CHILDS, BH ;
GILLIO, AP ;
SMALL, TN ;
YOUNG, JW ;
KERNAN, NA ;
OREILLY, RJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (17) :1185-1191
[22]   Risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation [J].
Przepiorka, D ;
Smith, TL ;
Folloder, J ;
Khouri, I ;
Ueno, NT ;
Mehra, R ;
Körbling, M ;
Huh, YO ;
Giralt, S ;
Gajewski, J ;
Donato, M ;
Cleary, K ;
Claxton, D ;
Braunschweig, I ;
van Besien, K ;
Andersson, BS ;
Anderlini, P ;
Champlin, R .
BLOOD, 1999, 94 (04) :1465-1470
[23]  
Rondon G, 1996, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V18, P669
[24]   Allogeneic cell therapy with donor peripheral blood cells and recombinant human interleukin-2 to treat leukemia relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation [J].
Slavin, S ;
Naparstek, E ;
Nagler, A ;
Ackerstein, A ;
Samuel, S ;
Kapelushnik, J ;
Brautbar, C ;
Or, R .
BLOOD, 1996, 87 (06) :2195-2204
[25]   GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE AS ADOPTIVE IMMUNOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED HEMATOLOGIC NEOPLASMS [J].
SULLIVAN, KM ;
STORB, R ;
BUCKNER, CD ;
FEFER, A ;
FISHER, L ;
WEIDEN, PL ;
WITHERSPOON, RP ;
APPELBAUM, FR ;
BANAJI, M ;
HANSEN, J ;
MARTIN, P ;
SANDERS, JE ;
SINGER, J ;
THOMAS, ED .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (13) :828-834
[26]  
SZER J, 1993, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V11, P109
[27]  
Tarantolo SR, 1998, BLOOD, V92, p722A
[28]   Graft-versus-myeloma effect: Proof of principle [J].
Tricot, G ;
Vesole, DH ;
Jagannath, S ;
Hilton, J ;
Munshi, N ;
Barlogie, B .
BLOOD, 1996, 87 (03) :1196-1198
[29]   Graft-versus-myeloma effect in two cases [J].
Verdonck, LF ;
Lokhorst, HM ;
Dekker, AW ;
Nieuwenhuis, HK ;
Petersen, EJ .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9004) :800-801
[30]   RECONSTITUTION OF CELLULAR-IMMUNITY AGAINST CYTOMEGALOVIRUS IN RECIPIENTS OF ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW BY TRANSFER OF T-CELL CLONES FROM THE DONOR [J].
WALTER, EA ;
GREENBERG, PD ;
GILBERT, MJ ;
FINCH, RJ ;
WATANABE, KS ;
THOMAS, ED ;
RIDDELL, SR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (16) :1038-1044