Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT

被引:93
作者
Wormanns, D
Ludwig, K
Beyer, F
Heindel, W
Diederich, S
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Orthoped, Sect Diagnost Radiol, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Marien Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40479 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
computed tomography; pulmonary nodule; sensitivity;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2527-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of double reading to increase the sensitivity of lung nodule detection at standard-dose (SDCT) and low-dose multirow-detector CT (LDCT). SDCT (100 mAs effective tube current) and LDCT (20 mAs) of nine patients with pulmonary metastases were obtained within 5 min using four-row detector CT. Softcopy images reconstructed with 5-mm slice thickness were read by three radiologists independently. Images with 1.25-mm slice thickness served as the gold standard. Sensitivity was assessed for single readers and combinations. The effectiveness of double reading was expressed as the increase of sensitivity. Average sensitivity for detection of 390 nodules (size 3.9 +/- 3.2 mm) for single readers was 0.63 (SDCT) and 0.64 (LDCT). Double reading significantly increased sensitivity to 0.74 and 0.79, respectively. No significant difference between sensitivity at SDCT and LDCT was observed. The percentage of nodules detected by all three readers concordantly was 52% for SDCT and 47% for LDCT. Although double reading increased the detection rate of pulmonary nodules from 63% to 74-79%, a considerable proportion of nodules remained undetected. No difference between sensitivities at LDCT and SDCT for detection of small nodules was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]   Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Del Turco, MR ;
Burke, P ;
Visioli, C ;
Paci, E ;
Zappa, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (09) :1645-1649
[3]   Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers [J].
Diederich, S ;
Thomas, M ;
Semik, M ;
Lenzen, H ;
Roos, N ;
Weber, A ;
Heindel, W ;
Wormanns, D .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (04) :691-702
[4]   Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers [J].
Diederich, S ;
Wormanns, D ;
Semik, M ;
Thomas, M ;
Lenzen, H ;
Roos, N ;
Heindel, W .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (03) :773-781
[5]   Pulmonary nodules: Experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT [J].
Diederich, S ;
Lenzen, H ;
Windmann, R ;
Puskas, Z ;
Yelbuz, TM ;
Henneken, S ;
Klaiber, T ;
Eameri, M ;
Roos, N ;
Peters, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :289-298
[6]   Helical CT of pulmonary modules in patients with extrathoracic malignancy: CT - Surgical correlation [J].
Diederich, S ;
Semik, M ;
Lentschig, MG ;
Winter, F ;
Scheld, HH ;
Roos, N ;
Bongartz, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (02) :353-360
[7]   Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness [J].
Fischbach, F ;
Knollmann, F ;
Griesshaber, V ;
Freund, T ;
Akkol, E ;
Felix, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (10) :2378-2383
[8]   Pulmonary nodules: detection with low-dose vs conventional-dose spiral CT [J].
Gartenschlager, M ;
Schweden, F ;
Gast, K ;
Westermeier, T ;
Kauczor, HU ;
von Zitzewitz, H ;
Thelen, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (04) :609-614
[9]   Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening [J].
Henschke, CI ;
McCauley, DI ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Naidich, DP ;
McGuinness, G ;
Miettinen, OS ;
Libby, DM ;
Pasmantier, MW ;
Koizumi, J ;
Altorki, NK ;
Smith, JP .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9173) :99-105
[10]   Peripheral lung cancer: Screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography [J].
Kaneko, M ;
Eguchi, K ;
Ohmatsu, H ;
Kakinuma, R ;
Naruke, T ;
Suemasu, K ;
Moriyama, N .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) :798-802