Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test

被引:50
作者
Wendler, D. [1 ]
Miller, F. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Dept Clin Bioeth, NIH Clin Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jme.2005.014043
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Dual-track assessment directs research ethics committees (RECs) to assess the risks of research interventions based on the unclear distinction between therapeutic and non-therapeutic interventions. The net risks test, in contrast, relies on the clinically familiar method of assessing the risks and benefits of interventions in comparison to the available alternatives and also focuses attention of the RECs on the central challenge of protecting research participants.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 486
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ETH POL ISS RES INV
[2]  
*I MED, 2004, ETH COND CLIN RES IN
[3]   Research involving cognitively impaired adults [J].
Karlawish, JHT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (14) :1389-1392
[4]   Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers [J].
Katzman, GL ;
Dagher, AP ;
Patronas, NJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (01) :36-39
[5]  
Levine R J, 1988, Law Med Health Care, V16, P174
[6]  
WEIIJER C, 2001, NBAC REPORT ETHICAL, V2, P1
[7]   When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? [J].
Weijer, C ;
Miller, PB .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2004, 10 (06) :570-573
[8]   The ethical analysis of risk [J].
Weijer, C .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2000, 28 (04) :344-361