Significant decrease in nelfinavir systemic exposure after omeprazole coadministration in healthy subjects

被引:25
作者
Fang, Annie F. [1 ]
Damle, Bharat D. [1 ]
LaBadie, Robert R. [1 ]
Crownover, Penelope H. [1 ]
Hewlett, Dial, Jr. [1 ]
Glue, Paul W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2008年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
nelfinavir; omeprazole; drug-drug interactions; pharmacokinetics; protease inhibitors; proton pump inhibitors;
D O I
10.1592/phco.28.1.42
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objectives. To assess the effect of omeprazole on the multiple-dose (steady-state) pharmacokinetics and safety of nelfinavir, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nelfinavir when administered alone and with omeprazole. Design. Open-label, two-period, single-fixed-sequence study Setting. Clinical research unit of a large, teaching hospital. Participants. Twenty healthy volunteers (mean age 26 +/- 9 yrs, range 18-48 yrs). Intervention. Subjects received nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours for 4 days (period 1). After a 7-day washout period, subjects were coadministered nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours and omeprazole 40 mg every 24 hours for 4 days (period 2). Measurements and Main Results. The pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 were determined on day 4 of both periods. Plasma samples were assayed by a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method for nelfinavir and M8 concentrations, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by using analytical software. In the presence of omeprazole, nelfinavir area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC(tau)), maximum observed plasma concentration (C-max) and minimum observed plasma concentration (C-min) were reduced by an average of 36%, 37%, and 39%, respectively, relative to administration of nelfinavir alone. The AUC(tau), C-max, and Cmin of M8 were reduced by an average of 92%, 89%, and 75%, respectively The slopes of the terminal elimination phase of nelfinavir and M8 plasma concentration-time curves were similar between treatments. Nelfinavir was well tolerated when administered alone and when coadministered with omeprazole. Conclusion. The observed reduction in the systemic exposure to both nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 after coadministration with omeprazole could result in loss of virologic control and potential emergence of drug resistance. Hence, omeprazole should not be coadministered to patients taking nelfinavir.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 50
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors - Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole [J].
Andersson, T .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1996, 31 (01) :9-28
[2]   Nelfinavir - An update on its use in HIV infection [J].
Bardsley-Elliot, A ;
Plosker, GL .
DRUGS, 2000, 59 (03) :581-620
[3]   Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir co-administered with cimetidine [J].
Boffito, M ;
Carriero, P ;
Trentini, L ;
Raiteri, R ;
Bonora, S ;
Sinicco, A ;
Reynolds, HE ;
Hoggard, PG ;
Back, DJ ;
Di Perri, G .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (06) :1081-1084
[4]  
Bowen WP, 2000, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V28, P781
[5]  
*BRIST SQUIBB CO, 2006, REY AT SULF PACK INS
[6]   Pharmacokinetic interaction between the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole and the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir [J].
Burger, DM ;
Hugen, PWH ;
Kroon, FP ;
Groeneveld, P ;
Brinkman, K ;
Foudraine, NA ;
Sprenger, H ;
Koopmans, PP ;
Hekster, YA .
AIDS, 1998, 12 (15) :2080-2082
[7]   Lack of effect of gastric acid-reducing agents on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients [J].
Chiu, Yi-Lin ;
Klein, Cheri E. ;
Woodward, William C. ;
King, Kathryn R. ;
Naylor, Christian ;
Awni, Walid ;
Brun, Scott .
AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2007, 21 (04) :247-251
[8]  
ELSHELTON MJ, 2006, J ACQ IMMUN DEF SYND, V42, P61
[9]  
*FOOD DRUG ADM, BMS DEAR DR LETT
[10]   Effect of antacids and ranitidine on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of fosamprenavir [J].
Ford, SL ;
Wire, MB ;
Lou, Y ;
Baker, KL ;
Stein, DS .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (01) :467-469