Spinal stiffness increases with axial load: another stabilizing,consequence of muscle action

被引:90
作者
Stokes, IAF [1 ]
Gardner-Morse, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
spine; stiffness; stability; axial preload; muscle activation;
D O I
10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00046-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
This paper addresses the role of lumbar spinal motion segment stiffness in spinal stability. The stability of the lumbar spine was modelled with loadings of 30 Nm or 60 Nm efforts about each of the three principal axes, together with the partial body weight above the lumbar spine. Two assumptions about motion segment stiffness were made: First the stiffness was represented by an 'equivalent beam' with constant stiffness properties; second the stiffness was updated based on the motion segment axial loading using a relationship determined experimentally from human lumbar spinal specimens tested with 0, 250 and 500 N of axial compressive preload. Two physiologically plausible muscle activation strategies were used in turn for calculating the muscle forces required for equilibrium. Stability analyses provided estimates of the minimum muscle stiffness required for stability. These critical muscle stiffness values decreased when preload effects were used in estimating spinal stiffness in all cases of loadings and muscle activation strategies, indicating that stability increased. These analytical findings emphasize that the spinal stiffness (as well as muscular stiffness) is important in maintaining spinal stability, and that the stiffness-increasing effect of 'preloading' should be taken into account in stability analyses. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Bergmark A, 1989, Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, V230, P1
[2]
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUSCLE FORCE AND STIFFNESS IN THE WHOLE MAMMALIAN MUSCLE - A SIMULATION STUDY [J].
CHOLEWICKI, J ;
MCGILL, SM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 117 (03) :339-342
[3]
Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: Implications for injury and chronic low back pain [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
McGill, SM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 11 (01) :1-15
[4]
EULER STABILITY OF THE HUMAN LIGAMENTOUS LUMBAR SPINE .2. EXPERIMENT [J].
CRISCO, JJ ;
PANJABI, MM ;
YAMAMOTO, I ;
OXLAND, TR .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 7 (01) :27-32
[5]
THE INTERSEGMENTAL AND MULTISEGMENTAL MUSCLES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - A BIOMECHANICAL MODEL COMPARING LATERAL STABILIZING POTENTIAL [J].
CRISCO, JJ ;
PANJABI, MM .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (07) :793-799
[6]
A PHYSIOLOGICALLY BASED CRITERION OF MUSCLE FORCE PREDICTION IN LOCOMOTION [J].
CROWNINSHIELD, RD ;
BRAND, RA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1981, 14 (11) :793-801
[7]
VARIATION OF LUMBAR SPINE STIFFNESS WITH LOAD [J].
EDWARDS, WT ;
HAYES, WC ;
POSNER, I ;
WHITE, AA ;
MANN, RW .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1987, 109 (01) :35-41
[8]
The effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on lumbar spine stability [J].
Gardner-Morse, MG ;
Stokes, IAF .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (01) :86-91
[9]
Physiological axial compressive preloads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture [J].
Gardner-Morse, MG ;
Stokes, IA .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2003, 21 (03) :547-552
[10]
INCORPORATION OF SPINAL FLEXIBILITY MEASUREMENTS INTO FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS [J].
GARDNERMORSE, MG ;
LAIBLE, JP ;
STOKES, IAF .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1990, 112 (04) :481-483