Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness

被引:82
作者
Dehler, Jessica [1 ]
Bodemer, Daniel [2 ]
Buder, Juergen [3 ]
Hesse, Friedrich W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fribourg, Dept Educ Sci, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Appl Cognit & Media Psychol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Knowledge Media Res Ctr, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Knowledge awareness; Knowledge communication; Group awareness tools; CSCL; Representational guidance; MUTUAL KNOWLEDGE; INFORMATION; VISUALIZATION; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.018
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Computer-mediated collaboration is not in and of itself a beneficial setting for learning. Environments for computer-mediated collaboration need to trigger learning-productive interactions. In this paper, we propose to implement tools providing group knowledge awareness (GKA), i.e., information about collaborators' knowledge. GKA is typically restricted in CSCL environments. A GKA tool visualizing self-assessed learner knowledge, their partner's self-assessed knowledge, and thus the distribution of knowledge, was studied in a computer-mediated collaborative learning scenario. Thirty-eight dyads were randomly assigned to either the GKA condition (GKA tool) or a control condition (only learner's own knowledge was visualized). Results show that the GKA tool guided learners in their collaboration and, more specifically, in designing their communicative acts. Depending on the self- vs. partner-oriented purpose of the communicative act, the learner's own vs. the partner's knowledge guided communication. Guided communication was a mechanism for perceived learning gains and perceived knowledge convergence. A knowledge test failed to reveal a significant difference between the GKA and the control condition. In this paper, we will discuss characteristics of GKA tools and their impact on collaboration. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1078
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Distributed Work, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/2464.003.0010
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Advances in Psychology, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115, 10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5, DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5]
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[5]   Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning [J].
Bodemer, Daniel .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (03) :1079-1086
[6]  
BRATITSIS T, 2007, P 7 COMP SUPP COLL L, P87
[7]  
BUDER J, 2009, P 8 COMP SUPP COLL L
[8]   Net-based knowledge communication in groups - Searching for added value [J].
Buder, Juergen .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 215 (04) :209-217
[9]   Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity [J].
Carroll, JM ;
Neale, DC ;
Isenhour, PL ;
Rosson, MB ;
McCrickard, DS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 58 (05) :605-632
[10]  
CLARK HH, 1991, PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIALLY SHARED COGNITION, P127, DOI 10.1037/10096-006