Effect of a clinical pathway for severe traumatic brain injury on resource utilization

被引:45
作者
Spain, DA [1 ]
McIlvoy, LH
Fix, SE
Carrillo, EH
Boaz, PW
Harpring, JE
Raque, GH
Miller, FB
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] Univ Louisville Hosp, Trauma Inst, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Univ Louisville Hosp, Dept Nursing, Louisville, KY USA
[5] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
traumatic brain injury; multiple injuries; clinical pathway;
D O I
10.1097/00005373-199807000-00022
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The usefulness of clinical pathways for the complex trauma patient is unclear. We analyzed the effect of a clinical pathway for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on resource utilization. Methods: A clinical pathway for severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than or equal to 8 at 24 hours) was developed by a multidisciplinary team and used for all patients with severe TBI, Data were gathered prospectively for 15 months and compared with data from historical controls from the previous year. Patients who survived < 48 hours were excluded. Results: The clinical pathway was used for 84 patients with severe TBI and compared with 49 historical controls. No differences in Injury Severity Scores (27 vs. 27) or GCS scores at 24 hours (6.2 vs. 6.5) existed between control or pathway patients. There was an overall increase in the mortality rate of pathway patients (from 12.2 to 21.4%), but this was entirely attributable to withdrawal of care that was initiated by family members in patients with an average age of 71 years, an average GCS score of 4.7, and an average Injury Severity Score of 29, Among survivors, pathway patients had a significant decrease in ventilator days (11.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 14.6 +/- 1.2; p < 0.05), intensive care unit days (16.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 21.2 +/- 1.4; p < 0.05), and hospital days (23.4 +/- 1.2 vs. 31.0 +/- 3.0; p < 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of complications or functional outcomes. Conclusion: The use of a clinical pathway for severe TBI resulted in a significant reduction in resource utilization. This study suggests that clinical pathways may be a useful component of patient care after blunt trauma. Key Words: Traumatic brain injury, Multiple injuries, Clinical pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 104
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*AM ASS NEUR SURG, 1996, GUID MAN SEV HEAD IN
[2]   Effect of feedback on resource use and morbidity in hip and knee arthroplasty in an integrated group practice setting [J].
Amadio, PC ;
Naessens, JM ;
Rice, RL ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Evans, RW ;
Morrey, BF .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 71 (02) :127-133
[3]   ENTERAL VERSUS PARENTERAL-NUTRITION AFTER SEVERE CLOSED-HEAD INJURY [J].
BORZOTTA, AP ;
PENNINGS, J ;
PAPASADERO, B ;
PAXTON, J ;
MARDESIC, S ;
BORZOTTA, R ;
PARROTT, A ;
BLEDSOE, F .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1994, 37 (03) :459-468
[4]  
Brothers TE, 1997, AM SURGEON, V63, P213
[5]   Impact of clinical pathways on hospital costs and early outcome after major vascular surgery [J].
Calligaro, KD ;
Dougherty, MJ ;
Raviola, CA ;
Musser, DJ ;
DeLaurentis, DA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 22 (06) :649-660
[6]  
CARRILLO EH, 1997, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V11, P210
[7]   Severe head injuries: An outcome prediction and survival analysis [J].
Combes, P ;
Fauvage, B ;
Colonna, M ;
Passagia, JG ;
Chirossel, JP ;
Jacquot, C .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (12) :1391-1395
[8]  
DAMELIO LF, 1994, AM SURGEON, V60, P180
[9]   CLINICAL PATHWAYS CAN BE BASED ON ACUITY, NOT DIAGNOSIS [J].
DAVIS, JT ;
ALLEN, HD ;
FELVER, K ;
RUMMELL, HM ;
POWERS, JD ;
COHEN, DM .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1995, 59 (05) :1074-1078
[10]  
FORKNER DJ, 1996, NURSING MANAGEMENT, V27, P35