Effect of a clinical pathway for severe traumatic brain injury on resource utilization

被引:45
作者
Spain, DA [1 ]
McIlvoy, LH
Fix, SE
Carrillo, EH
Boaz, PW
Harpring, JE
Raque, GH
Miller, FB
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] Univ Louisville Hosp, Trauma Inst, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Univ Louisville Hosp, Dept Nursing, Louisville, KY USA
[5] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
traumatic brain injury; multiple injuries; clinical pathway;
D O I
10.1097/00005373-199807000-00022
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The usefulness of clinical pathways for the complex trauma patient is unclear. We analyzed the effect of a clinical pathway for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on resource utilization. Methods: A clinical pathway for severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than or equal to 8 at 24 hours) was developed by a multidisciplinary team and used for all patients with severe TBI, Data were gathered prospectively for 15 months and compared with data from historical controls from the previous year. Patients who survived < 48 hours were excluded. Results: The clinical pathway was used for 84 patients with severe TBI and compared with 49 historical controls. No differences in Injury Severity Scores (27 vs. 27) or GCS scores at 24 hours (6.2 vs. 6.5) existed between control or pathway patients. There was an overall increase in the mortality rate of pathway patients (from 12.2 to 21.4%), but this was entirely attributable to withdrawal of care that was initiated by family members in patients with an average age of 71 years, an average GCS score of 4.7, and an average Injury Severity Score of 29, Among survivors, pathway patients had a significant decrease in ventilator days (11.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 14.6 +/- 1.2; p < 0.05), intensive care unit days (16.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 21.2 +/- 1.4; p < 0.05), and hospital days (23.4 +/- 1.2 vs. 31.0 +/- 3.0; p < 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of complications or functional outcomes. Conclusion: The use of a clinical pathway for severe TBI resulted in a significant reduction in resource utilization. This study suggests that clinical pathways may be a useful component of patient care after blunt trauma. Key Words: Traumatic brain injury, Multiple injuries, Clinical pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 104
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
Korpiel Michael R., 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P191, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199503001-00003
[22]   Treatment of traumatic brain injury with moderate hypothermia [J].
Marion, DW ;
Penrod, LE ;
Kelsey, SF ;
Obrist, WD ;
Kochanek, PM ;
Palmer, AM ;
Wisniewski, SR ;
DeKosky, ST .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (08) :540-546
[23]  
Millaire A, 1996, CARDIOVASC DRUG THER, V10, P11, DOI 10.1007/BF00051125
[24]   PERCUTANEOUS TRACHEOSTOMY GASTROSTOMY IN BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS - A MINIMALLY INVASIVE ALTERNATIVE [J].
MOORE, FA ;
HAENEL, JB ;
MOORE, EE ;
READ, RA .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 33 (03) :435-439
[25]  
Morton J R, 1995, Bull Am Coll Surg, V80, P30
[26]   Utility of clinical pathway and prospective case management to achieve cost and hospital stay reduction for aortic aneurysm surgery at a tertiary care hospital [J].
Muluk, SC ;
Painter, L ;
Sile, S ;
Rhee, RY ;
Makaroun, MS ;
Steed, DL ;
Webster, MW .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 25 (01) :84-93
[27]   Use of a national data base to assess perioperative risk, morbidity, mortality, and cost savings in coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Nikas, DJ ;
Freeman, JE ;
Luterman, AR ;
Warnken, LC ;
Nenstiel, RD ;
Farrell, M ;
Alpert, MA .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 89 (11) :1074-1077
[28]  
QUIGLEY MR, 1997, J TRAUMA, V41, P7
[29]  
RHODES M, 1996, AM J SURG, V173, P35
[30]  
RODRIGUEZ JL, 1990, SURGERY, V108, P655