Prior art: To search or not to search

被引:27
作者
Atal, Vidya [1 ]
Bar, Talia [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Econ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
Innovation; Patent; Prior art; Research and development; Search; PATENT; SCOPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.12.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To determine patentability, inventions are evaluated in light of existing prior art. Innovators have a duty to disclose any prior art that they are aware of, but have no obligation to search. We study innovators' incentives to search for prior art, their search intensities and the timing of search. We distinguish between early state of the art search conducted before R&D investment, and novelty search conducted right before applying for a patent. We identify conditions in which innovators have no incentive to search for prior art. Search intensity increases with R&D cost, the examiners' expected search effort, and with patenting fees. We also find that innovators prefer to correlate their search technology with that of the patent office. In light of our model, we discuss the implications of some proposed policy reforms. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 521
页数:15
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows:: The influence of examiner citations [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Gittelman, Michelle .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2006, 88 (04) :774-779
[2]   Applicant and examiner citations in US patents: An overview and analysis [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Gittelman, Michelle ;
Sampat, Bhaven .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (02) :415-427
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, W7552 NBER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure
[5]  
Caillaud B., 2007, Patent Office and Innovation Policy
[6]   PATENT SCOPE, ANTITRUST POLICY, AND CUMULATIVE INNOVATION [J].
CHANG, HF .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 26 (01) :34-57
[7]  
COCKBURN L, 2002, W8980 NBER
[8]  
COTROPIA CA, 2007, RECENT DEV INEQUITAB, P15882
[9]   Litigation and settlement in patent infringement cases [J].
Crampes, C ;
Langinier, C .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (02) :258-274
[10]   OPTIMAL PATENT LENGTH AND BREADTH [J].
GILBERT, R ;
SHAPIRO, C .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1990, 21 (01) :106-112