How much market do market-based instruments create? An analysis for the case of "white" certificates

被引:44
作者
Langniss, O
Praetorius, B
机构
[1] ZSW, Ctr Solar Energy & Hydrogen Res, D-70565 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] DIW Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
tradable certificates; energy efficiency; transaction cost;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Among the diverse economic instruments to foster energy efficiency (EE) and climate protection, tradable certificates have been investigated for renewable energy, and the EU directive on an emissions-trading scheme for CO2 certificates has been approved in 2003. In contrast, tradable energy efficiency-or "white"-certificates have only lately been considered as a market-based tool to foster EE as compared with standards and labelling, for example. Theoretically, there is little doubt about the advantages. In practice, however, some fundamental problems arise. Critical issues are the design of an efficient artificial market for white certificates, its compatibility with the European emissions-trading system, the identification of a suitable target group for an EE obligation and the measurement of energy savings as compared with a reference use of energy. We use the theoretical framework of transaction cost economics to elaborate these issues. We conclude that transaction costs and investment specificity will restrict markets for white certificates in practice. Long-term contracts rather than spot trade will be the prevailing form of governance for EE investments. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 211
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] *ELC, 2001, HAND MED ELC ETT SAT
  • [12] Ellis J., 2002, DEV GUIDANCE MONITOR
  • [13] ELLIS J, 2001, INITIAL VIEW METHODS
  • [14] ELLIS J, 2000, EMISSION BASELINES E
  • [15] MARKET FAILURE AND ENERGY-POLICY - A RATIONALE FOR SELECTIVE CONSERVATION
    FISHER, AC
    ROTHKOPF, MH
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1989, 17 (04) : 397 - 406
  • [16] Project-based greenhouse-gas accounting: guiding principles with a focus on baselines and additionality
    Gustavsson, L
    Karjalainen, T
    Marland, G
    Savolainen, I
    Schlamadinger, B
    Apps, M
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (13) : 935 - 946
  • [17] How to promote renewable energy systems successfully and effectively
    Haas, R
    Eichhammer, W
    Huber, C
    Langniss, O
    Lorenzoni, A
    Madlener, R
    Menanteau, P
    Morthorst, PE
    Martins, A
    Oniszk, A
    Schleich, J
    Smith, A
    Vass, Z
    Verbruggen, A
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (06) : 833 - 839
  • [18] Koomey J.G., 1990, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
  • [19] The renewables portfolio standard in Texas: an early assessment
    Langniss, O
    Wiser, R
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (06) : 527 - 535
  • [20] Absolute or relative baselines for JI/CDM projects in the energy sector?
    Laurikka, H
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2002, 2 (01) : 19 - 33