Pre-donation assessment of kidneys by magnetic resonance angiography and venography: Accuracy and impact on outcomes

被引:10
作者
Ames, SA [1 ]
Krol, M
Nettar, K
Goldman, JP
Quinn, TM
Herron, DM
Pomp, A
Bromberg, JS
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Recanti Miller Transplantat Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Mt Sinai Sch Med, Div Laparoscop Surg, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
kidney; donor; magnetic resonance angiography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00884.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Reports on the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in evaluating living donor renovasculature employ few patients or omit the consequences of inaccurate scans. We retrospectively compared intraoperative findings to MRA/MRV scans in 146 donor-recipient pairs. For detecting accessory arteries and early branching, MRA sensitivity was 57.6%, specificity 96.5%, false positive rate 3.5%, false negative rate 42.4%, positive predictive value 82.6%, negative predictive value 88.6% and overall accuracy 87.7%. By excluding clinically inconsequential accessory arteries, MRA sensitivity rose to 73.1%, specificity to 96.7% and overall accuracy to 92.5%. For MRVs, sensitivity was 56.2%, specificity 99%, false positive rate 1%, false negative rate 43.8%, positive predictive value 90%, negative predictive value 94.8% and accuracy 94.5%. Inaccurate scans were associated with prolonged donor and recipient operations and more frequently reconstructed arteries, but did not affect clinical outcomes. Because most missed accessory arteries are inconsequential, MRA is a useful, less invasive method for defining donor renovascular anatomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1518 / 1528
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Prospective comparison of 3-dimensional volume rendered computerized tomography and conventional renal arteriography for surgical planning in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy [J].
Abou El Fettouh, H ;
Herts, BR ;
Nimeh, T ;
Wirth, SL ;
Caplin, A ;
Sands, M ;
Ramani, AP ;
Kaouk, J ;
Goldfarb, DA ;
Gill, IS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (01) :57-60
[2]
Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography [J].
Bakker, J ;
Ligtenberg, G ;
Beek, FJA ;
van Reedt Dortland, RWH ;
Hené, RJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (08) :1167-1172
[3]
Use of gadolinium-enhanced, ultrafast, three-dimensional, spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of living renal allograft donors [J].
Buzzas, GR ;
Shield, CF ;
Pay, NT ;
Neuman, MJ ;
Smith, JL .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (12) :1734-1737
[4]
RENAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE PREOPERATIVE DETECTION OF SUPERNUMERARY RENAL-ARTERIES IN POTENTIAL KIDNEY DONORS [J].
DEBATIN, JF ;
SOSTMAN, HD ;
KNELSON, M ;
ARGABRIGHT, M ;
SPRITZER, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1993, 28 (10) :882-889
[5]
Doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of potential live kidney donors: A prospective study [J].
ElAzab, M ;
Mohsen, T ;
ElDiasty, T ;
Shokeir, AA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (03) :878-880
[6]
Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors:: value of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography and comparison of three rendering algorithms [J].
Fink, C ;
Hallscheidt, PJ ;
Hosch, WP ;
Ott, RC ;
Wiesel, M ;
Kauffmann, GW ;
Düx, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) :794-801
[7]
FRIESE RJ, 2002, BMC MED RS METHODOL, V2, P8
[8]
Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: Which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors? [J].
Giessing, M ;
Kroencke, TJ ;
Taupitz, M ;
Feldmann, C ;
Deger, S ;
Turk, I ;
Budde, K ;
Ebeling, V ;
Schoenberger, B ;
Loening, SA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (06) :1000-1002
[9]
Gourlay WA, 1995, TRANSPLANTATION, V60, P1363
[10]
GRAINGER RG, 2001, GRAINGER ALLISONS DI, pCH2