View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects

被引:32
作者
Lawson, R
Humphreys, GW
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Psychol, Liverpool L69 7ZA, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Cognit Sci Res Ctr, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1998年 / 60卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03211939
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a series of three experiments, we examined, first, the effects of viewpoint in depth on the efficiency of initial picture naming and, second, the effects of priming on subsequent naming. On initial presentation, foreshortened views were harder to name than were more typical (nonforeshortened) views. In addition, priming increased as a function of the similarity of the prime and target. Indeed, if a fore shortened view of an object had already been named, the subjects named a subsequent foreshortened view of that object as fast as or faster than they named a subsequent, more typical view. These results provide evidence against theories that predict full view-invariant object recognition and view-invariant priming of object recognition. Instead, the results support theories that suggest that object recognition is mediated by stored representations that are both view and object-specific.
引用
收藏
页码:1052 / 1066
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]  
LAWSON R, IN PRESS VISUAL COGN
[32]  
Marr D., 1982, VISION
[33]  
Palmer S., 1981, ATTENTION PERFORM, VIX, P135
[34]   A CASE OF VIEWER-CENTERED OBJECT PERCEPTION [J].
ROCK, I ;
DIVITA, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 19 (02) :280-293
[35]  
ROCK I, 1981, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V7, P719, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.719
[36]   PERCEPTUAL SPECIFICITY IN NONVERBAL PRIMING [J].
SRINIVAS, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (03) :582-602
[37]   REPRESENTATION OF ROTATED OBJECTS IN EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT MEMORY [J].
SRINIVAS, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (04) :1019-1036
[38]   MENTAL ROTATION AND ORIENTATION-DEPENDENCE IN SHAPE-RECOGNITION [J].
TARR, MJ ;
PINKER, S .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 21 (02) :233-282
[39]   IS HUMAN OBJECT RECOGNITION BETTER DESCRIBED BY GEON STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS OR BY MULTIPLE VIEWS - COMMENT ON BIEDERMAN AND GERHARDSTEIN (1993) [J].
TARR, MJ ;
BULTHOFF, HH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (06) :1494-1505
[40]  
TARR MJ, 1994, 35 ANN M PSYCH SOC S