A framework for assessing the vulnerability of food systems to future shocks

被引:90
作者
Fraser, EDG [1 ]
Mabee, W
Figge, F
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Environm, Leeds Inst Environm Sci & Management, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.futures.2004.10.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Modem society depends on complex agro-ecological and trading systems to provide food for urban residents, yet there are few tools available to assess whether these systems are vulnerable to future disturbances. We propose a preliminary framework to assess the vulnerability of food systems to future shocks based on landscape ecology's 'Panarchy Framework'. According to Panarchy, ecosystem vulnerability is determined by three generic characteristics: (1) the wealth available in the system, (2) how connected the system is, and (3) how much diversity exists in the system. In this framework, wealthy, non-diverse, tightly connected systems are highly vulnerable. The wealth of food systems can be measured using the approach pioneered by development economists to assess how poverty affects food security. Diversity can be measured using the tools investors use to measure the diversity of investment portfolios to assess financial risk. The connectivity of a system can be evaluated with the tools chemists use to assess the pathways chemicals use to flow through the environment. This approach can lead to better tools for creating policy designed to reduce vulnerability, and can help urban or regional planners identify where food systems are vulnerable to shocks and disturbances that may occur in the future. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 479
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[31]  
FRASER ED, 2000, J ARBORICULT, V26, P107
[32]  
Fraser EDG, 2003, CONSERV ECOL, V7
[33]   Mutual vulnerability, mutual dependence - The reflexive relation between human society and the environment. [J].
Fraser, EDG ;
Mabee, W ;
Slaymaker, O .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2003, 13 (02) :137-144
[34]  
FRIEDLAND W, 1994, GLOBAL RESTRUCTURING
[35]  
GLIESSMAN SR, 1998, AGROECOLOGY
[36]  
*GLOB ENV FAC, 2000, OP PROGR 13 CONS SUS
[37]   THEORY OF DIVERSITY-STABILITY RELATIONSHIPS IN ECOLOGY [J].
GOODMAN, D .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1975, 50 (03) :237-266
[38]  
GOW D, 2003, GUARDIAN UNLIMI 0507
[39]  
GROOMBRIDGE B, 1992, WORLD CONSERVATION M
[40]  
Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems