Brachial artery catheterization to facilitate endovascular grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Safety and rationale

被引:41
作者
Criado, FJ
Wilson, EP
Abul-Khoudoud, O
Barker, C
Carpenter, J
Fairman, R
机构
[1] Union Mem Hosp, MedStar Hlth, Div Vasc Surg, Ctr Vasc Intervent, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Div Vasc Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2000.109335
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is a technically demanding procedure that is based on the complexity and multiplicity of steps and the guidewire and catheter manipulations required. Brachial artery catheterization is an adjunctive technique that can facilitate the placement of an endoluminal prosthesis. Methods: Brachial access was used during endoluminal AAA repair in 79 of 103 consecutive patients with a modular-design stent-graft prosthesis at two institutions. Results: Left brachial access facilitated (1) angiography to guide juxtarenal device deployment, (2) antegrade contralateral limb access, (3) device delivery through disadvantaged iliac arteries by means of a brachial femoral wire, (4) access to renal arteries when necessary, and (5) catheter exchanges and a reduction in fluoroscopic positional changes. Complications included one puncture-site pseudoaneurysm, seven hematomas, and 29 patients with extensive ecchymosis. The length of stay was not prolonged in any case. There were no embolic, oculocerebral, or ischemic upper extremity events. Conclusions: Brachial artery catheterization, as an adjunctive technique to endoluminal AAA repair, offers noteworthy technical advantages with few, but self-limiting complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1141
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] BLUM U, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P1
  • [2] CRIADO FJ, 1999, TECHNIQUES VASCULAR, P133
  • [3] CRIADO FJ, 1999, DURABILITY VASCULAR, P433
  • [4] FERGUSSON DJG, 1986, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V12, P209
  • [5] Risk of catheter-related emboli in patients with atherosclerotic debris in the thoracic aorta
    Karalis, DG
    Quinn, V
    Victor, MF
    Ross, JJ
    Polansky, M
    Spratt, KA
    Chandrasekaran, K
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1996, 131 (06) : 1149 - 1155
  • [6] Brachial artery access for percutaneous renal artery interventions
    Kaukanen, ET
    Manninen, HI
    Matsi, PJ
    Soder, HK
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (05) : 353 - 358
  • [7] A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The access study
    Kiemeneij, F
    Laarman, GJ
    Odekerken, D
    Slagboom, T
    vanderWieken, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (06) : 1269 - 1275
  • [8] LAWRENCEBROWN MMD, 1999, DURABILITY VASCULAR, P375
  • [9] Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Analysis of 303 patients by life table method
    May, J
    White, GH
    Yu, WY
    Ly, CN
    Waugh, R
    Stephen, MS
    Arulchelvam, M
    Harris, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) : 213 - 220
  • [10] Evaluation of a modular endovascular bifurcation prosthesis in a canine aortic aneurysm model
    White, RA
    Fogarty, TJ
    Kopchok, GE
    Wilson, E
    Ayres, B
    Zalewski, M
    Donayre, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (06) : 1034 - 1042