Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases

被引:138
作者
Panousis, K [1 ]
Grigoris, P
Butcher, I
Rana, B
Reillyl, JH
Hamblen, DL
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Western Infirm & Associated Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00016470510030805
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The diagnosis of prosthetic infection remains a challenge, as no test is 100% sensitive and 100% specific. Recent advances in molecular biology have enabled the detection of infection in culture negative cases. Patients and methods We evaluated the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in detecting infection in failed joint replacements prospectively in 91 consecutive patients (92 prosthetic joints) undergoing revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. Synovial fluid was collected intraoperatively and examined by broad-range PCR assay for detection of bacterial DNA. The clinical diagnosis of infection was based on the results of blood tests, preoperative joint aspiration, culture and histology of multiple intraoperative tissue samples, as well as the surgeon's assessment. 12 joints (13%) were infected, but the PCR was positive in 32 cases. The sensitivity of the technique was 92%, the specificity 74%, the accuracy 76%, the positive predictive value 34%, and the negative predictive value was 98%. Interpretation The PCR technique cannot be recommended for the routine detection of prosthetic infection. The large number of false positive results may represent sample contamination, or bacterial presence related to low-virulence organisms, low bacterial load, or a strong host immune response.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 346
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTION BY FROZEN-SECTION DURING REVISION ARTHROPLASTY [J].
ATHANASOU, NA ;
PANDEY, R ;
DESTEIGER, R ;
CROOK, D ;
SMITH, PM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (01) :28-33
[2]
THE VALUE OF ASPIRATION OF THE HIP-JOINT BEFORE REVISION TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
BARRACK, RL ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (01) :66-76
[3]
BROSIUS J, 1978, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V75, P4801, DOI 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4801
[4]
Canvin JMG, 1997, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V36, P203
[5]
Elimination of bacterial DNA from Taq DNA polymerases by restriction endonuclease digestion [J].
Carroll, NM ;
Adamson, P ;
Okhravi, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (10) :3402-3404
[6]
Contamination and sensitivity issues with a real-time universal 16S rRNA PCR [J].
Corless, CE ;
Guiver, M ;
Borrow, R ;
Edwards-Jones, V ;
Kaczmarski, EB ;
Fox, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (05) :1747-1752
[7]
Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement [J].
Davis, N ;
Curry, A ;
Gambhir, AK ;
Panigrahi, H ;
Walker, CRC ;
Wilkins, EGL ;
Worsley, MA ;
Kay, PR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05) :886-889
[8]
Fitzgerald Jr, 1995, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V3, P249
[9]
GAMBHIR AK, 2000, J BONE JOINT SURG S1, V1, P82
[10]
WHITE CELL SCANS AND INFECTED JOINT REPLACEMENTS - FAILURE TO DETECT CHRONIC INFECTION [J].
GLITHERO, PR ;
GRIGORIS, P ;
HARDING, LK ;
HESSLEWOOD, SR ;
MCMINN, DJW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (03) :371-374