Effect of individual anatomy on resting motor threshold - Computed electric field as a measure of cortical excitability

被引:31
作者
Danner, Nils [1 ,2 ]
Kononen, Mervi [1 ,3 ]
Saisanen, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Laitinen, Rita [2 ,3 ]
Mervaala, Esa [1 ,2 ]
Julkunen, Petro [1 ]
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Radiol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor threshold; Electric field; Cortical excitability; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTEX DISTANCE; CORTICOMOTOR THRESHOLD; BRAIN-STIMULATION; HEALTHY HUMANS; COIL; REPEATABILITY; ORIENTATION; POTENTIALS; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.10.004
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used for assessing the excitability of cortical neurons and corticospinal pathways by determining the subject-specific motor threshold (MT). However, the MT is dependent on the TMS instrumentation and exhibits large variation. We hypothesized that between-subject differences in scalp-to-cortex distance could account for the variation in the MT. Computational electric field (EF) estimation could theoretically be applied to reduce the effect of anatomical differences, since it provides a more direct measure of corticospinal excitability. Methods: The resting MT of the thenar musculature of 50 healthy subjects (24 male and 26 female, 22-69 years) was determined bilaterally at the primary motor cortex with MRI-navigated TMS using monophasic and biphasic stimulation. The TMS-induced maximum EF was computed at a depth of 25 mm from the scalp (EF25mm) and at the individual depth of the motor cortex (EFcortex) determined from MRI-scans. Results: All excitability parameters (MT, EF25mm and EFcortex) correlated significantly with each other (P < 0.001). EFcortex at MT intensity was 95 +/- 20 V/m for biphasic and 120 +/- 24 V/m for monophasic stimulation. The MT did not correlate with the anatomical scalp-to-cortex distance, whereas the coil-to-cortex distance was found to correlate positively with the MT and negatively with EFcortex (P < 0.05). Discussion: In healthy subjects, the scalp-to-cortex distance is not a significant determinant of the MT, and thus the use of EFcortex does not offer substantial advantages. However, it provides a purposeful and promising tool for studying non-motor cortical areas or patient groups with possible disease-related anatomical alterations. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Awiszus F, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P13
[2]   Characterisation of paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation conditions yielding intracortical inhibition or I-wave facilitation using a threshold-hunting paradigm [J].
Awiszus, F ;
Feistner, H ;
Urbach, D ;
Bostock, H .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 129 (02) :317-324
[3]  
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[4]   ELECTRIC VS MAGNETIC TRANS-CRANIAL STIMULATION OF THE BRAIN IN HEALTHY HUMANS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF CENTRAL MOTOR TRACTS CONDUCTIVITY AND EXCITABILITY [J].
CARAMIA, MD ;
PARDAL, AM ;
ZAROLA, F ;
ROSSINI, PM .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1989, 479 (01) :98-104
[5]   Cortical excitability and sleep deprivation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study [J].
Civardi, C ;
Boccagni, C ;
Vicentini, R ;
Bolamperti, L ;
Tarletti, R ;
Varrasi, C ;
Monaco, F ;
Cantello, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 71 (06) :809-812
[6]   Impact of coil position and electrophysiological monitoring on determination of motor thresholds to transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Conforto, AB ;
Z'Graggen, WJ ;
Kohl, AS ;
Rösler, KM ;
Kaelin-Lang, A .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (04) :812-819
[7]   Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold [J].
Danner, Nils ;
Julkunen, Petro ;
Kononen, Mervi ;
Saisanen, Laura ;
Nurkkala, Jouko ;
Karhu, Jari .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2008, 174 (01) :116-122
[8]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Physics, electrophysiology, and applications [J].
Fatemi-Ardekani, Ali .
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2008, 36 (5-6) :375-412
[9]   Human brain connectivity during single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Ferreri, Florinda ;
Pasqualetti, Patrizio ;
Maatta, Sara ;
Ponzo, David ;
Ferrarelli, Fabio ;
Tononi, Giulio ;
Mervaala, Esa ;
Miniussi, Carlo ;
Rossini, Paolo Maria .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (01) :90-102
[10]  
Forster MT, 2011, NEUROSURGERY