Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design

被引:87
作者
Cabeza, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Systemat & Ecol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
connectivity; dispersal; habitat loss; metapopulation; probability models; reserve-selection;
D O I
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00475.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Quantitative methods for the design of reserve networks often select over-dispersed reserves, and consequently a number of species extinctions can be expected in such reserves, especially if unprotected surrounding habitat is lost. A novel approach that deals with this problem is presented by considering factors such as habitat quality and spatial configuration of reserves during the selection process. Species-specific effects of habitat loss and fragmentation, together with habitat composition, are taken into account when computing species probabilities of local occurrence. Sites are then chosen to represent all species with a given target probability. The method is applied to a dataset of butterflies and moths from the Creuddyn Peninsula, North Wales, UK, which includes species with various responses to habitat quality and configuration. The results show that the resulting level of reserve clustering will depend on the number of species for which the spatial configuration plays an important role (at the scale under consideration), and on the pattern and amount of habitat loss that is expected to follow around the reserves. The method represents a step towards taking better into account species persistence when selecting reserve networks in a changing world.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 672
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation
    Margules, CR
    Pressey, RL
    Williams, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2002, 27 (04) : 309 - 326
  • [22] Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology
    Moilanen, A
    Nieminen, M
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2002, 83 (04) : 1131 - 1145
  • [23] On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology
    Moilanen, A
    Hanski, I
    [J]. OIKOS, 2001, 95 (01) : 147 - 151
  • [24] AN UPGRADED RESERVE SELECTION ALGORITHM
    NICHOLLS, AO
    MARGULES, CR
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1993, 64 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [25] NICHOLLS AO, 1998, CONSERVATION CHANGIN
  • [26] Possingham H, 1998, QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, P291
  • [27] Possingham H, 1993, P 12 AUSTR OP RES C, P536
  • [28] Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much?
    Pressey, RL
    Possingham, HP
    Margules, CR
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 76 (03) : 259 - 267
  • [29] BEYOND OPPORTUNISM - KEY PRINCIPLES FOR SYSTEMATIC RESERVE SELECTION
    PRESSEY, RL
    HUMPHRIES, CJ
    MARGULES, CR
    VANEWRIGHT, RI
    WILLIAMS, PH
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1993, 8 (04) : 124 - 128
  • [30] Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss
    Pressey, RL
    Taffs, KH
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 100 (03) : 355 - 376