A practical approach to implementation of ecosystem-based management: a case study using the Gulf of Maine marine ecosystem

被引：27

作者：

Altman, Irit ^{[1
]}

Blakeslee, April M. H. ^{[2
]}

Osio, Giacomo C. ^{[3
]}

Rillahan, Christopher B. ^{[4
]}

Teck, Sarah J. ^{[5
]}

Meyer, John J. ^{[6
]}

Byers, James E. ^{[1
]}

Rosenberg, Andrew A. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Biol Sci, Durham, NH 03824 USA

[2] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Marine Invas Lab, Edgewater, MD 21037 USA

[3] Univ New Hampshire, Inst Study Earth Oceans & Space, Durham, NH 03824 USA

[4] War Pacific Natl Hist Pk, Hagatna, GU USA

[5] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Ecol Evolut & Marine Biol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA

[6] Oregon State Univ, Dept Zool, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA

来源：

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT | 2011年 / 9卷 / 03期

关键词：

RESILIENCE; IMPACTS; BIODIVERSITY; EXPERIENCES; DEPLETION; HISTORY; SHIFTS;

D O I：

10.1890/080186

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

The application of ecosystem-based management (EBM) in marine environments has been widely supported by scientists, managers, and policy makers, yet implementation of this approach is difficult for various scientific, political, and social reasons. A key, but often overlooked, challenge is how to account for multiple and varied human activities and ecosystem services and incorporate ecosystem-level thinking into EBM planning. We developed methods to systematically identify the natural and human components of a specific ecosystem and to qualitatively evaluate the strength of their interactions. Using the Gulf of Maine marine ecosystem as a case study, we show how these methods may be applied, in order to identify and prioritize the most important components to be included in an EBM plan - particularly the human activities that are the strongest drivers of ecosystem change and the ecosystem services most threatened by cumulative and indirect effects of these activities.

引用

页码：183 / 189

页数：7

共 29 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being

[2]

Arkema KK, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P525, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[525:MEMFCT]2.0.CO

[3]

[4] Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being [J].

Balmford, A ;

Bond, W .

ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (11) :1218-1234

[5]

Brodziak J, 2002, B MAR SCI, V70, P589

[6] Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems [J].

Crain, Caitlin Mullan ;

Kroeker, Kristy ;

Halpern, Benjamin S. .

ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 11 (12) :1304-1315

[7] Sustainability -: Resolving mismatches in US ocean governance [J].

Crowder, L. B. ;

Osherenko, G. ;

Young, O. R. ;

Airame, S. ;

Norse, E. A. ;

Baron, N. ;

Day, J. C. ;

Bouvere, F. ;

Ehler, C. N. ;

Halpern, B. S. ;

Langdon, S. J. ;

McLeod, K. L. ;

Ogden, J. C. ;

Peach, R. E. ;

Rosenberg, A. A. ;

Wilson, J. A. .

SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) :617-618

[8] A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services [J].

de Groot, RS ;

Wilson, MA ;

Boumans, RMJ .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (03) :393-408

[9] Marine ecosystem-based management as a hierarchical control system [J].

de la Mare, WK .

MARINE POLICY, 2005, 29 (01) :57-68

[10]

Fogarty MJ, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, pS6, DOI 10.2307/2641359

← 1 2 3 →